How the hell in the worlds did blowing up the executor spaceship of darth vader/of anakin skywalker save even more billions of an amount of galactic civilian lives, dudes?????
Do you think Vader just cruised around in that ship so he could pick up chicks?! For crap's sake, even if it wasn't a Death Star, it could destroy the population of a planet with ease. It was designed to destroy, and it would have destroyed more Rebel ships and bases had it still been around. Goodness! When are the good guys justified in actually fighting back in your opinion?
Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker could not pick up any chicks whatsoever with that executor starship/spaceship. Maybe, nah, oh well, definitley, his younger, his more attractive, and&/or his more handsomer olympian demigod called/named Hayden Christensen verison of himself, could definitley do such a thing. The good guys are freaking always, justified in fighting back against their evil enemies, in-my opinion, dude!!!!! I hate to be a nitpicker over here, darth endeor, dude, but it wasn't really so much a threat to the imperial civilians/the imperial citizens, as it was to their wartime enemies!!!!!!
Yay! I guess since I'm new I better ask: how much of a walloping should I expect? It seems like it was just the natural evolution of the thread, and evolution is always strange when you have Sith Lords messing with the DNA But to put things back on track, if I could label a machine as the biggest badbooty of the universe, I would probably pick the Executor!
I would say it's Boba Fett. He's shown with that certain aura of mystery and power and he was a very skilled bounty hunter. Going by the option presented before, Arvel Crynyd was definitely (as much as I dislike him for doing what he did ) noble and in the category as well.
This is not the thread for that. Keep the discussion on topic. Adding to my point before, not only was Boba skilled, but he learned from a very young age without his father's help, and becoming the "best bounty hunter in the galaxy". Actually, I guess you could say near the same about Han. I'll have to think about that.
Maybe "chicks" but an awful lot of "females" (including me) wouldn't give the Hayden Christensen-Anakin a second look if one were to go by looks alone. Or even by character. Or both combined. Handsome, Olympian demigod - oh, that's a good one.
I am a male person!!!! But anyways, are you calling Hay Chris an ugly man??? Why the hell does the word/the term "chicks" offend-the You U???
Why the hell are you yelling at me - because I don't worship at the feet of Hayden? I'm not offended, I just don't consider myself a "chick" and I doubt anyone else here would (I'm 55, okay, not a hot, young "chick"). And sorry, Hayden is fine in the looks department, but nothing special, but I have to wonder why some believe external looks are the be all/end all behind characters. I prefer not to ascribe motives or personality to external appearances but to patterns of behavior.
A chick is one of those synonyms for a-female human being person-the other adjectives being lady, girl, woman, babe, gal, whatever!!!! But, also, your arguementative strategy is very inconsitent because of that post that you'd had made before!!!
Huh? You know, following your posts is difficult at times and I wonder if you actually read the posts before responding. I *think* you mean you don't understand that GL wrote and filmed a series of fantasy/space opera films. In that genre, all that matters is that the movie is fun and entertaining; it doesn't have to "close loopholes" or explain motivations. GL never figured folks would spend hours arguing on the internet about stuff. Is that clear?
