Canon XL-1

It is more than just the implement....

It is the *force* behind said implement that makes all the difference..

For example:

http://www.schoolis2die4.com/

Check it out...

"watch old trailer"

 

A. I think you made the thread title what it is so people would read it.

B. It doesn't have anything to do with an XL1.

C. Don't put that many of anything in your title.

D. Don't expect a big response from a title that's a lie.

E. Learn markup codes.



This lecture brought to you by the letters 'F' 'I' and 'G.'

 

Oh really,spamboy?
check out the site and then the technical credits.....

this post brought to you by the letters
"F" and "0".....

 

he is right

 

I hear JVC's suck.

 

Skyy, I wouldn't recommend making enemies here, especially in your first few posts. We at this forum tend to be pretty tight knit, and if you bash on one person, you're bashing on many.


The trailer was interesting.


I also want to point out that, whether you're aware of it or not, your website is a BLATANT rip-off of the makers of Duality, which, unfortunately for you, are famous on this forum.

 

For Skyy's sake.

 

WOW, Fig!

Such composure for someone who just got called "spamboy"!

Skyy, if you would like to get respect then I suggest you show it.

As for your trailer... Nice! Something I would definitely like to see more of.

 

Ok.. I think Fig is right.

Sure, if you hunt through the site you can find reference to the XL-1, but the title of the thread is deceptive, blatantly so. So much so that rather than looking at the site and garnering some respect for the people who made it and their project the effect was the opposite. I have lost respect for them and now don't give a rats pewpy (waits for mod censorship) for their project.

They lied to me to get my hit on their counter, but they got the ONLY hit they'll get out of me. I think the technical term for this is twerpism.

 

Don't mess with fig! You're on the wrong path for respect, I'll tell you.

Well I'm just takin up space. Back to my mod duties at BSU

 

A. I think you made the thread title what it is so people would read it.

I think you do that every time you post. This coming from a guy whose last title was "...wait...what?"

I'm sorry, but I won't stand for Fig putting someone down when his netiquette still leaves a lot to be desired.

M. Scott

 

Despite the fact that I agree with you, Dorkman, Fig made one thread lately, that I can recall, that had a decent title. "Is Motion Tracking PB only?"

He'll probably argue saying that his titles are "creative," and this title isn't.

Also, I think you won't be his favorite TFNer anymore for a while.

 

No, his was decieving. I make, as AWB said, creative titles more often than not for my threads. But they aren't decieving.


I don't make a thread about motion tracking named 'NATALIE PORTMAN BREASTS HERE!' I have made ONE thread promising NP pics, but that was when I was still a real newbie, and it was a joke.



Or, Michael...I would change the above but I'm afraid I'd step too far into political incorrectness.

 

Edited upon request.

 

Well... THAT didn't take long...

EDIT: Poor AWB... All that detective work just to yank it down...

Sage H.

 

I don't make a thread about motion tracking named 'NATALIE PORTMAN BREASTS HERE!' I have made ONE thread promising NP pics, but that was when I was still a real newbie, and it was a joke.

Blah, what's the big deal about Natalie Portman? Just because she was in Star Wars, everyone is like "OHHHH, She's HOT!!"

I don't think she is ugly or anything, she is slightly attractive, but I never understood why some of you hold her as a goddess.

Personally, I like Carmen Electra or Nikki Cox.

I'm not putting anyone down, I'm just curious what is so great about Natalie Portman.

 

Sage, c'mon. We don't wanna make Skyy's title justifiable. He's a newbie, I was a newbie, and I got hell for it then.

 

I was referring to AWB...

Sage H.

 

Yeah, I know. But it took me a second, and I catch these pretty quick. I don't wanna, you know, look bad.

 

Too late.




-Mac

 

I've killed for less.


DLR references need to be made more.

 

Pixel: my thoughts EXACTLY on the whole Niobe Dean drool club here on the boards, lol!

(and for the record, I was a Nat fan since The Professional...which is NOT sick b/c I was the same age as she was back then too)

 

Dragnet....having just seen tyour profile....are you in the military or anything of the sort? You have the haircut.


Plus, I don't think it's ok to link to that image.


Plus, it looks like you photoshopped yourself in front of the stang.





FYI

 

I think the title is deceptive and unprofessional. Try to act more mature next time.

I watched your old trailer. Extremely artsy, nicely put together. However, it looks like another "teen with problems" movie, except there must be some odd excuse for a gun fight. I haven't seen the movie, yet, so I will not fully pass judgement on it.

~Neszis~

 

Sage, c'mon. We don't wanna make Skyy's title justifiable. He's a newbie, I was a newbie, and I got hell for it then.

And strangely, you didn't learn.

Though I do have to agree that the title thing was pretty childish.

But:

Skyy, I wouldn't recommend making enemies here, especially in your first few posts. We at this forum tend to be pretty tight knit, and if you bash on one person, you're bashing on many.

Sometimes. But the "letters F and O" thing was hilarious.

M. Scott