Note that 77% of the "children" were males, and most of them were adolescents. That doesn't sound like rape. It sounds like old-fashioned homosexual sex (man and a male adolescent) to me. I'm not sure where you get your info from, but that's blatantly false. I can recall plenty of stories of children under the age of 13 who were molested. Regardless of the age of the people who were molested, it was clearly and terribly wrong in each case. I have not heard of a single traditionalist priest committing these sins. That doesn't mean it didn't happen. I don't know why people get the iea that if they haven't heard of something, it must be true or untrue (depending on the case).