ST Did Star Wars Need a "Rebootquel" ?

Yes, please try to be more scientific with your data collection on a semi-obscure wholly inconsequential Star Wars-themed message board next time.

 

The article may well mention "good" rebootquels, but it is far from an accepted term, unwieldy, clumsy and there is far from a consensus about TFA being a rehash, let alone something as stupid sounding as a "rebootquel"

Note the fact that despite several people who like TFA having posted, hardly anyone has voted yes; we think the premise is flawed. So your data is useless. Unless you are specifically polling "how many people who like the term rebootquel and think it applies to TFA agree that Star Wars needed a rebootquel?"
Which seems a bit of an odd demographic to poll. It's almost as if you just wanted to start your own bashing thread and attempt to drum up support for this "rebootquel" thing which you are determined to try to impose

 

Not sure what relevance the "obscurity" and inconsequentiality of the board has, since any data gathered here would only be used here. Surely it's best, if trying to poll people, to ask a neutral question which doesn't self select a biased demographic which skews the results, wherever it is?

 

I just googled rebootquel.

This thread is on the first page of results. Yeah, it's a buzzword that is taking the world by storm.

 

What was rebooted?

 

Yes now click on those links and read. That is the next step.

 

A better question is what wasn't rebooted.

 

This thread needs a lockinquel!

 

It's rebooting it.

 

Everything.

 

It's not about being scientific, it's about being inclusive. Especially since the tone of the OP indicates the poll is basically "Did Star Wars need to be ruined or not?"
It's the old "When did you stop beating your wife?" gag.

 

OK... so you haven't seen TFA yet. You should see it. It's a pretty entertaining rebootquel.