Senate Does "Absolute Truth" exist?

Discussion in 'Community' started by ophelia, Feb 12, 2014.

  1. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9
    But doesn't this create a logical paradox?

    In that, nothing inherently except a personal choice, would distinguish God's contact with man in Christian or Islamic texts, right? In that you would only pick one over the other - Pepsi or Coke, in effect, just on a divine scale.

    But if you accept that as true - that God revealed his plans to man - then you have to accept the revelation to Mohammed as a valid discussion with God.

    To do that though, then you have to accept God told Mohammed that Christians got his will wrong; in effect, that they screwed up and Islam is the most current iteration of God's will?
  2. ophelia Cards Against Humanity Host. Ex-Mod

    Game Host
    Member Since:
    Jun 25, 2002
    star 6
    Hmm. I'm not sure I'm following you. Just because you can believe that God has spoken directly to mortals doesn't mean that you have to accept every claim of direct mortal contact with God. It would be perfectly reasonable to believe that God spoke to Abraham but not Jesus or Mohammed, for instance.
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  3. Mortimer Snerd Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Dec 27, 2012
    star 4
    God just told me to kill my children. I told him to go **** himself. He's not speaking to me anymore.
  4. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9

    But if you discount one, then why not discount all?

    i.e. a Christian is likely to disbelieve God revealed his truth and plans to Mohammed because is contradicts their beliefs and because of political reasons. In other words, it's arbitrary, the criteria for which you believe happened. None have more evidence than the other for occurring.

    So if that is the case, and if on objective terms the manner in which God appears to the various monotheistic texts is similar enough to rule our inconsistency, then everything that follows from that is by definition subjective. Informed by individual bias. So, if that's the case, how do we know God knows absolute truth? We can't. We only have the word of men who claimed to hear it, but they didn't write it down at the time, so..?
  5. ophelia Cards Against Humanity Host. Ex-Mod

    Game Host
    Member Since:
    Jun 25, 2002
    star 6
    Yes, there would be no difference between a world in which God is unknowable and a world in which God did not exist. As for why one might choose to believe in a deity anyway, I'll leave that for the Thunderdomeâ„¢.
  6. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9
    I'm not meaning to disprove or prove religion so much as ask if there actually is absolute truth? If the premise for absolute truth is, in and of itself, untruthful (insofar as being less of a truth and more of a supposition) then can it actually exist or is it just what we call God's will?
  7. LostOnHoth Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2000
    star 5
    God communicated directly with me last night in the form of a prime rib steak with wine jus. I am now a True Believer.
  8. Alpha-Red Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Apr 25, 2004
    star 5
    Okay sure, cool beans. But if it's cool beans then uhh, why are we having this conversation?
  9. timmoishere Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 2, 2007
    star 6
    The sad thing about Christians is that they somehow think their fiction is actually true. And when you dispute what they say, they get very predictable. First they'll say "God is love! You're taking quotes out of context! You went to the wrong church!" Then when that tactic doesn't work, they'll switch to quoting random passages out of the Bible. When that doesn't work, they'll start threatening you with hell. When that doesn't work, they'll offer to pray for you.

    Like clockwork, every time. It's quite amusing, but also frustrating at the same time.
  10. harpua Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 12, 2005
    star 8
  11. Lord Vivec Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Apr 17, 2006
    star 7
    It's not our fault that certain people feel the need to infuse their religion into every topic.
    anakinfansince1983 likes this.
  12. Zapdos Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 7, 2013
    star 5
    lol this is a really stupid argument
    anakinfansince1983 likes this.
  13. CT-867-5309 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 5, 2011
    star 5
    Unsurprisingly, you and your children are still alive.



    I know this thread was basically created for just this purpose, but you guys don't have to respond to Christians. I mean, you can just ignore them and continue discussing whatever topic you were discussing and focus on whatever you want. You don't have to let them derail threads with their raging Christianity. Or you can take them to the Thunderdome.

    Or you can indulge them, it's cool. I know it can be funny, but for me debating Christians seems so 1999.
    Hank Hill likes this.
  14. slightly_unhinged Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Jan 28, 2014
    star 3
    So you know observer effects in quantum physics where measuring a wave seems to force it to 'choose' an eigenstate, is that subjectivism determining objective truth?
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  15. Alpha-Red Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Apr 25, 2004
    star 5
    Uh no offense, but you seem to be the sort of person who would provoke that kind of reaction from them. Religion is seen as something sacred, that's just how it's been for...all of human history. Some people abandon religion, some people don't...but you're not being realistic or reasonable if you expect everyone in the world to convert to your way of thinking overnight.
    Last edited by Alpha-Red, Feb 12, 2014
    MrZAP, Jedi Merkurian and Point Given like this.
  16. timmoishere Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 2, 2007
    star 6
    I wasn't expecting folks to convert to my way of thinking. I was just expressing how predictable their arguments are in this sort of discussion.
  17. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9
    It's a topic that doesn't require a copy-paste of the same anti-religious arguments though. In reality, this discussion can continue without the following:

    1) A jihad against religion
    2) Agreement on whether God exists

    Now, here's a real kicker. The thread topic is a philosophical question, so arguments being held to same standard as physics theories is, in fact, not the case.

    Honestly guys, can there be a point in which you try and engage in the topic?
    MrZAP and Jedi Merkurian like this.
  18. Rogue_Ten Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2002
    star 7
    to be fair, ophelia pretty much admitted in the op that she started the thread to troll jeezo-freaks
    Last edited by Rogue_Ten, Feb 12, 2014
  19. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9
    No, she wanted a place where Moviefan could talk about his belief without it being included in a bunch of other threads.

    What annoys me about this is that there's thin veneer of intellectual pretension masking a mind that's not really capable of constructing arguments.

    In that you could talk to the topic, but it's fun to instead recycle placard level arguments as if a titanic intellect had, on that very spot, hewn the argument out of adamantium using just their mind and a copy of The God Delusion (not read, but skimmed through for pithy quotes).

    @ophelia, you asked me what I meant when I said if we did dismantle religion, we'd just replace it with something else? Yeah, so take the anti-religious sentiment in these threads, hold a mirror up to it, and see if it doesn't sound like a hardcore religious person. Just worshipping the unseeing, unloving, unmerciful light of no-God, don't mind me!
  20. ophelia Cards Against Humanity Host. Ex-Mod

    Game Host
    Member Since:
    Jun 25, 2002
    star 6
    @Ender Sai, Re whether "absolute truth" is the same as "God's will:" Well, the problem is we can't get to it, whatever we call it. We're essentially trapped within our skulls and so our realities are necessarily subjective. And I'm not going to touch the question of whether atheism is also a faith-based belief system. I don't want timmo to punch me in the eye. :p

    I'd argue no, for the same reason I posted up top.

    In case anyone cares, I'm basically talking about Kant's concepts of noumenon (things-in-themselves, or objective things that would exist without a human observer) and phenomenon (things as they appear to us.) The noumenon is the tree falling in the forest when there's nobody around to hear. We simply can't get at that experience. All we have are impressions of the world filtered through our senses and our mind processes. How close do our perceptions match the "objective world?" We'll never know. So talking about knowledge of anything "absolute" is a bit silly.

    And yes, for what it's worth, I largely made this thread so I'd have a place to refer Moviefan2k4 to when his talk about "absolute truth" threatened to derail another thread. I also think the question is genuinely worth looking at, though, particularly since Moviefan isn't the only person in the world who thinks as he does.
  21. Rogue_Ten Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2002
    star 7
    leave moviefan alone, he's the best poster left in this joint imho
  22. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9
    I genuinely want to hear his response to my points, and not for some BS point scoring reason.
    Jedi Merkurian and Rogue_Ten like this.
  23. Rogue_Ten Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2002
    star 7
    you're aiight, that was just a general warning to the forum. as of this post moviefan is under my protection

    call me "defender of the faith"
    Last edited by Rogue_Ten, Feb 12, 2014
  24. Lord Vivec Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Apr 17, 2006
    star 7
    Just like in Civ V, I tend to ignore when leaders put city-states under their protection.
  25. Ender Sai Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2001
    star 9
    Vivec

    As a general rule, the impact of throwing down any form of gauntlet is greatly diminished if one uses Civ references to reinforce oneself.
    Last edited by Ender Sai, Feb 12, 2014
    Rogue_Ten likes this.