Dual-Alias Admins, Secret Agendas, and Firing Beloved Moderators

Sorry I didn't see your post. Just be patient dude.

I have probably said "Hey I realize the JC is not real important, and that my job is, so I'm going to be busy the next few days".

Does that mean anything? No... I still do my job. What exactly are you trying to get at? Maybe you should just spit it all out. I know you won't be doing so in the style or lack there of that SDA used, but you might actually get a response out of me if you just get to the damn point.

 

Please, this isn't a Refuge vs JC thing.

 

What ever happened to Star Wars??

 

I'll put it in small words for you, PBoy.

You. Suck. As. An. Admin.

Do. Us. All. A. Favor. And. Quit.

:b


And take Azeem with you. Is that simple enough?

 

He did get to the damn point.

He's saying you're not mature enough to handle the position. An opinion that a lot of people would agree with.

You can't ban a person for speaking their mind just because you disagree with what they're saying or how they're saying it without angering others.

 

Please, this isn't a Refuge vs JC thing.

Sure it isn't.

 

I love you Obey!!

 

Please.

Guys.....

Can we stop this petty back and forth sny comment flinging and just deal with the issues at hand?

 

The only thing I have a time dealing with [which is where all of your complaints come from] is handling the crap like this. Most of my time on the JC is enjoying this place in a constructive way like a normal member should and looking after Games.

When you have a complaint there, then I'll talk. Otherwise, stop wasting your time. Self-fufilling complaints don't deserve any attention.

 

*edited*

 

Can we stop this petty back and forth sny comment flinging and just deal with the issues at hand?

What's the issue? SDA thinks that the promotion of Preacherboy and Darth Lud should promt a JC Walkout.

Good luck!

*edit*

I'd love to get more insight on this gem of information, but Refuge kids don't like to take a stand. This is the difference between a 'Fact' and 'Hersay.'

Fact -- According to a person "in the know" at TF.n (whose name will remain anonymous)

 

Don't forget the fact that the top 2 moderators are going to get FIRED. His unban request was a riot, too. Something about him posting backed-up facts.

rofllololol

 

You can't ban a person for speaking their mind just because you disagree with what they're saying or how they're saying it without angering others.

Exactly. And that's why it comes up now, just like it has in the past: PreacherBoy isn't fit to be an Administrator. This is completely off the point of the original thread, but he's made it a point here.

How many times has he flamed me in this thread?

1. Do you really think we need more misinformation in a time where Usama bin Ladin is trying to start a Jihad via the same means?

2. Troll.

3. he doesn't have a right to do is blatantly lie and spread filth

4. A lot of people are telling me that I should let SDA do his incoherant ranting, so everyone can see how stupid his remarks are.

5. I'm letting someone with child management skills take over the SDA case.

I count 5.

Your banning of me was completely baseless. It was done for personal reasons, not on the basis of any rule. You don't like me. I don't like you. You're an Administrator. You ban me.

Hmmm.

I posted proof to back up my initial claim. Others (including Moderators) came in to back me up. I won't reveal the source of the conversation I posted, as the participants are friends of mine and asked to remain anonymous.

I spoke clearly, intelligently, and honestly, and was backed up by others who communicated in the same way, and I was still unjustly banned.

That action speaks volumes about the state of this place, more than I could've ever imagined anything could. My point is proven.

With that, I leave. Feel free to continue this conversation, and decide amongst yourselves whether or not this place (a place I love) is worth saving.

Cheers.

SDA

 

You're letting yourself believe it's a Refuge vs JC thing so you can feel better about disagreeing with whatever is being said here.

If this was a Refuge vs JC thing would we be having some JC admins who go to the Refuge resigning? Wouldn't we, in theory, be keeping our numbers high so we could win this supposed war?

 

Now see, that's inappropriate. What takes place between a banned member and the admins should be kept there. You don't post things like that in public, PB. If you're so mature and capable, you should know that.

 

I'm sorry, I didn't realize that we were passing out moderatorships to members with a history of trolling.

 

How does being a Refugee equate with having no principles?


Edit - Cigam had a post removed and that is why both Obey Wann and I are quoting him.

 

Quote: .I disagree with the Refuge because I have principles.


And your principles include supporting someone like Preacherboy who constantly flames others? Has a condasending attitude towards others?

 

Unlike some, Obey Wann... I have a constructive purpose in being here. The only people I "flame" are the people that get in the way of constructive and positive progress.

The Administration will ban anyone who is planning any sort of deconstructive interruption/attack on the JC. We have too much to deal with, as is. We don't need anybody posting here that would spend the time to figure out a way to cause a problem here. If you have a point, be literate. If you have "facts", they better be facts.

 

So you're saying that anyone who disagrees with you will be banned? Is that correct?



Sounds more like a Taliban-like answer than someone who is supposed to be a mature, responsible administrator.

I thought this was the land of the brave, home of the free.

I fought, and still fight for the freedoms that the USA holds up, yet in your little world, you take the dictator route.

I'm impressed. :b


Well, if you're going to ban anyone who dissents, you might as well start now. Because I will continue to state my beliefs, whether you like them or not.

 

Where did I say "disagree" in my last post? That's right, no where. I said that I will only deal with people that offer no constructive criticism or rational arguements. That's all I've been saying and doing. You can believe that I've said something different, but that'd just make you look damn stupid.

 

"The only people I "flame" are the people that get in the way of constructive and positive progress."

I dunno, maybe it's just me but I read that to say that you break the very rules you're supposed to enforce and that said flaming is directed at those that get in YOUR way of what YOU consider to be constructive and positive progress.

Like I said, could just be me.....

 

OH YOU "read" THAT! WELL IT MUST BE TRUE!

Give it a rest lady.

 

Yeah, I read it that way. And I'll rest when you're gone and not a second before then.

 

Noted, but judging by your history, you might be gone first.