Fine. Just for the record I was not the one who mentioned all the downfalls of another religion....that was Snowdog attacking Christianity. I was not being the hypocrite. I did not say that people of other religions are evil. I did say that evolutionists are hypocrites becuase they say that the book of Genisis is a fairy tail becuase it has no scientific proof, and then they sometimes use primordial soup as a theory in their science, even though their is no evidence for it either. They say that faith in Creationism is not science. They say that faith in Evolution IS science. But didn't they say that faith was not science in the first place? To use the theory of primordial soup, or the big bang for that matter, they need to follow by blind faith, just like Creationists follow Creationism. But somehow when they place faith in an idea (not a hypothesis, which is an educated guess based on already existing facts), it is still science. Can someone please tell me how faith in primordial soup or the Big Bang theory IS science while faith in Creationism is not science (and you must hold up your argument that faith can not be science)? This is bias in a debate. The evolutionists have created their own stumbling block, but they choose to ignore it rather than address it as a problem, because one of their main arguments has been "faith is not science." THIS is hypocrisy.