Lit Fleet Junkie Flagship- The technical discussions of the GFFA (Capital Ships thread Mk. II)

I don't really have the time these days to keep up with all the threads I'd like to, but I'd like to chime in that the some of the common criticisms of the ISD are not really iron-clad.

In the history of warship design, when the result is unusual, given the choice of explaining it with a) "hur hur, incompetence!" or b) "there was probably a confluence of technical and logistical factors that caused this, because no one likes to muck about with expensive complex weapons systems," bet on B).

Reactor:
The whole "exposed" business is somewhat specious, given a) shields, and b) The structure of the bulb could easily support just as much armor as the surrounding planar hull surfaces. The cross-sections do not show this explicitly, but there is more than enough space to support the demonstrated thicknesses that do exist.

Also, extending the dagger shape to encompass the reactor might well have led to an unacceptable increase in mass, rather than just separately armoring the part of the reactor that didn't completely fit. One might argue that the reactor had the size was determined by what was necessary to support the military functions of the ship, and that the hull form was the best compromise between extra mass, protection, and the ability to provide the space necessary to support those functions. In a universe where astromech droids can handle FTL navigation, it is entirely possible that KDY had sufficient computational power to run enough simulations to yield a final hull design was the optimal compromise of various factors. Keep in mind the real world precedence of shaping and thinning transverse armor bulkheads and barbette structures to save weight; the goal is always to provide the maximum practicable protection. Even the largest non-Treaty limited battleships (Yamato) employed the flying deck and other such design features to bring down size and cost.

Bridge:
Raising the sensor globes as far above the hull as possible is not really hard to explain; electronics and sensors are often isolated to minimize interference with other systems.

The relative exposure of the bridge (say, compared to a deep hull CIC) might have been quite deliberate. The bridges and control areas of many battleships built after WWI were relatively poorly protected compared to the vitals. It was accepted to improve stability, reduce overall armor weight, and simplify the organization of space (see the "all-or-nothing" concept). Given the presence of shields, and the fact that ISDs are obviously not designed to specifically combat swarming attacks by small craft, there might be similar mechanisms at work in the design of the ISD superstructure.

Given that the Tector's reactor doesn't bulge- maybe the factor that made the difference, was the launch bays?

If the Imperial was a modification of the Tector (rather than vice versa) that might have forced the reactor outward to make space for the bays.

Not sure why the Allegiance has both bulging reactor and no launch bays though.

The bulge probably exists because the reactor size is fixed for the power you need, but the hull size is the minimum practicable to hold everything it needs to hold. A bigger hull than you need requires more power to move and material to build. If it's roughly as effective to armor a bulb and beef up your shields as it is to have a bigger, more expensive, and harder to power hull, there's no reason not to go with the bulb.

There's nothing saying the Tector actually has the same hull as the ISD though. ISDI and ISDII have different hull forms, and those are specifically noted to be subclasses.

Are there any pictures of the Tector model? We see the belly of the ship in the movie- but we don't know what the top looks like.

Based on the ROTJ opening battle shot, they appear to be similar to the Imperial/Victory/Procursator/Allegiance profile when seen from afar. Unless there's an explanation turning all the excess background ships into Victorys or some other class. 33 Imperials at the battle and 3 Tectors, according to EGTW. This image shows 37 ISD-like ships in addition to the Executor, so at least 4 of them have to be non-ISDs. 3 Tectors at most and at least one non-Imperial/non-Tector.

"Faithful to Kuat Drive Yards' design philosophy of 'terror styling', the [Executor bridge] tower is deliberately positioned in full view of any ship that might dare risk an attack" - CL

I think that's about as reasonable as explanation as you could get for the reactor bulge, especially factoring in that they could just compensate with stronger shields.

I cant wait to see the Giel Star Frigate? and the Eidolon models your working on

I don't think there's much there. Been a while since I read it. The DESB was better in that regards.

In other news, I finally took some time out to find various variations of the Imperial-class and Victory-class. Just smaller things and spec changes, not big things like the superlaser on the Conqueror. That kinda turns the design into a whole other design. Same with the Tector-class and Interdictor-class.

Imperial variants
Victory variants

The E-wing was said to have already proved itself in "a dozen sorties" prior to the Battle of Calamari. The NR fleet was said to have been "worn down" by Thrawn, and had "more pilots than it had fighters". The NR fleet sent to Mon Calamari suffered heavy losses during the Battle of Mon Calamari.

Interesting... the entry on the Rebel Alliance in the handbook states that the NR took back Coruscant during the Imperial Civil War, but decided that they couldn't hold it and abandoned it again.

The World Devastators are said to be powered by "miniature black holes"...

It's a shame that we've never had any further looks at those ships, like the Pelagia.

Pretty cool, I think we should get a few more official Imperial ISD variants out of that. I can't believe for all I have played Battlefront that I never thought about the side hanger variant.

I've seen a reference to at least one modified Victory-class (no side fins) at Endor.

They where apparently already around in the Thrawn Crisis per the EGVV so properly saw action before that, especially the Rim campaigns that Ackbar moved the Fleet to after Thrawn was beaten would make a good candidate for these sorties.

We also know there were "dozens" of WD fleets surrounding Republic worlds in the audio drama.

That would be the Dominator who is referred to as lacking fins only because the CCG card art simply used the image of an ISD from behind (which they did for the generic victory-class SD card, so we can chalk it to artistic license)

How about referring to the escort carrier as the Super Transport VIII escort carrier, and having there be a container ship variant, the Super Transport VIII bulk cruiser, and referring to the container ship variants of the Super Transport line as the Super Transport # bulk cruiser in keeping with similar ships like the Quasar Fire-class bulk cruiser?

Well, the Quasar fire seems like it was a bulk cruiser design from the start, but refitted into a cruiser-carrier rather than just a cruiser. See the Battle-Horn class for a similar outcome.
The Escort Carrier is more like the WWII CVEs. Take a freighter hull design, modify it the minimum amount to carry fighters, and call it good. It looks like it started as a Kuat freighter design, then some were repurposed to carry fighters.
Bulk cruisers are purpose built warships, of a sort. Mainly for things like commerce protection, they tend to be slow and underpowered for a warship, but superior to most potential threats. They are meant to be escort vessels, and only backwaters and the desperate use them as main line warships as built.

All that said, the Super Transport hulled Imperial escort carriers do lack an proper name/designation, as do the Storm Commando escort carriers from Rogue Leader.

I like how it stops rotating to extend its docking tube. Also, it appears only a portion is spinning, while there's a section with the crew that stays normal. Plus, we get to see the Corona's bridge for the first time. Very Star Trek-esque.

Hondo also says three of his lieutenants turned on him, implying he has even more and therefore more ships in his forces.

He also said his 'empire' got devastated by Grevious suggesting his pirate forces are reasonably large.

And strangely, I agree in that the saucer ships somehow work.

Possibly. Still- we also see finless Victory-class ships in the Dark Empire comics.

Yeah, finless VSD's are rather common in DE. One wonders if they are the same class or not (I don't think we ever saw one next to an ISD to compare the sizes...my memory may be faulty though).

And any questions about VSD's I can most likely answer. Just look at my sig after all.

This set of Victory pics

includes the finless Victory from Dark Empire, shown below and slightly in front of a larger ship which looks like an ISD.

Hmm....certainly has the right bridge. And that is some sort of SD above it...but is it an ISD...its hard to tell. That is most likely a true finless VSD though, since I can't see anything that leads me to believe it ISN'T a VSD (other than the obvious lack of fins).