Discussion in 'Community' started by jp-30, Aug 11, 2008.
So, who won?
The game's ongoing.
ok, who won this round? He's posted!
Surely he's just messing with everyone here now
I dunno. He did post concerns about the Australian election thing in one of the Aussie FanForces.
It only counts if it's posted in Comms.
shame on you for not checking
[link=http://boards.theforce.net/communications/b10006/30734094/p1/?5]Does this board only abide by federal rules?[/link]
I think this new thread feels forced and obviously created for the benefit of this thread. It should be disqualified, IMO.
I would concur. It lacks the lack of thought so typically characteristic of these threads.
We can't disqualify on intent. The thread stands and is valid.
Anyone come close?
Well, let's see... in the rough (very rough) vicinity:
jp-30: 'Does Australian law (sex, drinking] count if posted from their'
malkie: "is banning against the consitution"
I think jp's is closest
Clearly jp fixed it. He's in cahoots with beezel. That's why he's so keen the thread isn't disqualified.
Haha! You can't prove nothing.
No but I think the suspicious timing of it all is proof of something.
do the mods have a plan for 2012?
I'd like to add a bid in the thread:
"Is porn of invisible women against the TOS since you can't see nipple or hooha?"
How plans for Indiana Jones 5 (6, 7) because
Beezel activity on the increase.
Stay frosty everyone.
"Mods should ban x user because what they did on their webcam"
Figure I'll go with a topic he's posting in currently.
'Mods, did DarthSapient have access to my webcam?'
I know this isn't a thread but I think his post in the Moving thread is worth posting here.
Wasn't that one of the Home Alone movies?
is photos misuse a misuse in TOS bullying terms
He includes question marks at the ends of his thread titles now?