main
side
curve
  1. In Memory of LAJ_FETT: Please share your remembrances and condolences HERE

Jar Jar could have killed Grievous...and Vader!

Discussion in 'Prequel Trilogy' started by LeeKenobi, May 22, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LeeKenobi

    LeeKenobi Jedi Knight star 6

    Registered:
    Aug 13, 2002
    By complete accident, of course...with an energy ball.

    Think about it--Grievous is about 90% droid--and droids shut down when hit by Gungan balls.

    So it would be safe to assume that if Grievous or Vader got hit by an energy ball, their mechanical parts would simply shut down--leading to their deaths.
     
  2. thegoldeneel

    thegoldeneel Jedi Youngling

    Registered:
    May 22, 2005
    Jar Jar killing Grievous is the best Idea ever. I hate that the character was abandoned so Lucas could get more money, hopefull he will restore his scenes to the DVD.
     
  3. Chaotic_Serenity

    Chaotic_Serenity Jedi Padawan star 4

    Registered:
    Oct 10, 2004
    I hate that the character was abandoned so Lucas could get more money, hopefull he will restore his scenes to the DVD.

    Uh, what? Those scenes were cut for different reasons. Not just for Jar Jar.
     
  4. Lars_Muul

    Lars_Muul Jedi Grand Master star 6

    Registered:
    Oct 2, 2000
    What scenes?



    Hmmm
    /LM
     
  5. Fallen_Jedi_Master

    Fallen_Jedi_Master Jedi Youngling

    Registered:
    May 23, 2005
    GO JAR JAR!!!!! i would have loved to have seen jar jar kill grievous. even though i hate jar jar.
     
  6. SHAUN-FOREVER

    SHAUN-FOREVER Jedi Youngling star 2

    Registered:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Yeah he could have, but that would not say much about Grievous and Vader would it?
     
  7. CieSharp

    CieSharp Jedi Grand Master star 4

    Registered:
    May 18, 2002
    If Luke had died, I could see Obi-Wan appearing to Leia and saying "You will go to the Naboo system. There you will meet the gungans and procure a gungan energy ball. You will then throw the energy ball at Darth Vader!"
     
  8. ExarKunundrum

    ExarKunundrum Jedi Youngling star 2

    Registered:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Energy balls? Stuff 'em. He could have just acted like himself for 3 hours in front of grievous and vader and they would have commited suicide to alleviate the tortue.
     
  9. SHAUN-FOREVER

    SHAUN-FOREVER Jedi Youngling star 2

    Registered:
    Nov 26, 2004
    [face_laugh] It's true! it's true!
     
  10. DarkSithDrew

    DarkSithDrew Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 24, 2004
    I think that Vader would have sensed it with the force, and stoped the energy ball as well ;) :p
     
  11. SithLord4488

    SithLord4488 Jedi Youngling star 1

    Registered:
    May 22, 2005
    JAR JAR was so annoying! I hated him
     
  12. RurouniKJS

    RurouniKJS Jedi Youngling star 2

    Registered:
    May 4, 2005
    Energy balls? Stuff 'em. He could have just acted like himself for 3 hours in front of grievous and vader and they would have commited suicide to alleviate the tortue.

    Two words: FORCE CHOKE. Works on Gungans, too!

    (I'm sure the Force-impaired Grievous could get creative...)


     
  13. AzureAngel2

    AzureAngel2 Chosen One star 6

    Registered:
    Jun 14, 2005
    He doesn´t need to kill them. Just let him open his mouth and then enough damage is done. Believe me!
     
  14. sword_of_raditz

    sword_of_raditz Jedi Knight star 5

    Registered:
    Jun 2, 2005

    Lol! Anyway, i think an energy ball against Grevious or Vader would annoy them. They'd take out their lightsabers and kill Jar-Jar, and everyone loves Grevious or Vader! Grevious or Vader might need robotics to live, but I'm sure the only thought they'd get right before a gungun energy ball hit them would be, "Stupid Jar-Jar. I'm going to kill him as soon as this energy ball bounces off my armor."
     
  15. whiteeagle

    whiteeagle Jedi Master star 6

    Registered:
    Dec 24, 2004
    no way he could kill vader or gg, he killed those droids by total luck.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.