Theoretically, maybe. I agree completely that the average person will stop in their tracks seeing a headline about Clemens like that, I'm just not sure thats the kind of publicity this report needs. EDIT: Incidentally, the front page of the local (Columbia) paper (not just the sports page, either) featured large pictures of Roberts and Clemens... though there was one good article on Roberts and exactly what the Mitchell report said about him, and talking about how weak the evidence was. Also made the good point at the end that for all we know, Roberts may indeed have used steroids, but that the evidence presented is far too weak to simply assume he did. Amazingly, it was written by the one person known for writing horrible articles, and who has only written a couple decent ones that I've seen over the years he's worked here.