Clone Wars Official "The Clone Wars" Series Discussion Thread (Spoilers Allowed)

Discussion in 'Star Wars TV' started by RevantheJediMaster, Jul 15, 2005.

  1. Barriss_Coffee Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Jun 29, 2003
    star 6
    Aha! I recall back in the AOTC spoiler days we got some new Sith concept art that looked like the forerunner to Kit Fisto. When the first AOTC production photos leaked and we saw Kit Fisto for the first time in front of the blue screen, a lot of us conjectured he was the Sith Lord. Is that what Filoni's referring to?
  2. Darth_Harmon Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jul 4, 2005
    star 4
    Seems that from there, Dave goes into what we've heard from IGN.

    We're getting more TCW, then move on to whats next (Episode VII, spin-off movies, next animated series)

    Aaaand they're moving into season 5 discussion. So as of now we just know of Order 66 and Clovis, but nowhere was it implied that these are the only two. Dave seems to imply that some characters will not be resolved, and it doesn't appear that there will be a "conclusion" to the series in the form of a real ending.

    Yup! That sounds like what they're talking about.
    Last edited by Darth_Harmon, Apr 5, 2013
  3. Ani501st Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2013
    star 3
    Good news for the Clovis arc !
  4. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    I do want to see Anakin beating the **** out of Clovis the Clovis arc.
    Barriss_Coffee likes this.
  5. EHT New Films Manager

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2007
    star 6
    That's the only reason I want to see the Clovis arc. :p
    TrandoJedi likes this.
  6. Darth_Harmon Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jul 4, 2005
    star 4
    Sounds like Maul wont be resolved on the show, at least how Dave is talking. Jimmy Mac refers to the Zillo Beast and how Maul has disappeared into the shadows the same way.
  7. 07jonesj Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2010
    star 4
    Sidious tortures and examines him to attempt to discover how he survived Naboo. Eventually, he kills him.

    Frankly, it makes more sense IU than him converting him into an assassin, when Maul has so much dangerous information that could topple Sidious' ultimate plan.
    TreborSabreon and TrandoJedi like this.
  8. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    With the rumor going around about an Obi-Wan/Maul standalone movie, this doesn't surprise me.
  9. Darth_Harmon Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jul 4, 2005
    star 4
    And to be honest, I don't think its a bad thing that TCW leaves some things open. Hell, the Star Wars movies did the same thing. The one thing I never wanted TCW to do was to wrap up every single thing to the point of killing off all the original characters. I like the idea of Bane and Hondo and Ahsoka and Talzin still being out there, unresolved. That, I think, is the best legacy that TCW can leave on the franchise. Leave characters like those available for future projects.

    I'd even go so far to say that I've accepted Maul's last appearance on the show. I like the idea of Maul being pulled into the dark, scary, secret places that Palpatine has established. Sort of like Boba Fett falling into the Sarlacc pit. It wasn't an ultimate resolution for the character, but at the same time it was a situation that few have escaped from.
    InterestingLurker likes this.
  10. DarthTalgus Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 3, 2012
    star 3
    can somebody post a link to the RFR thing that you are talking about ?
    Last edited by DarthTalgus, Apr 5, 2013
  11. Darth_Harmon Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jul 4, 2005
    star 4
  12. swcolts1277 Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Jan 5, 2013
    star 2
    I listened to it as well and we are for sure getting Clovis and Order 66, but I think that won't be all. So I'm guessing we will also get Yoda and Boba Fett arcs and maybe one more but no more than those 5.
  13. The Shadow Emperor Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 29, 2012
    star 4
    They could show nothing but the bounty hunters arc and I'd be satisfied. :D
  14. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    Darth Maul died in 32 BBY on Naboo.
    Eeth Koth died in 22 BBY on Geonosis.
    Even Piell died in 19 BBY on Coruscant.
    That fits well with the movies, doesn't it?
  15. The Shadow Emperor Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 29, 2012
    star 4
    No, it doesn't. "Sith Lords are our specialty?" Maul is what makes that line make sense.

    Eeth Koth and Even Piell aren't seen in Episode III, so their deaths fit with the movies no matter what.
  16. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    Asajj Ventress makes that line make absolute sense. They should have mentioned Maul in the movies if he had come back. (And don't say that Ventress isn't a Sith, because Darth Maul's evil doppelgänger is not a Sith because of Dooku.)
  17. 07jonesj Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2010
    star 4
    Asajj isn't a Sith.

    She's a Dark Acolyte. :p

    Well, actually she's a bounty hunter now.
    Last edited by 07jonesj, Apr 5, 2013
  18. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    No, she is not a Bounty Hunter. I was saying that Ventress was a Dark Acolyte.
  19. 07jonesj Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2010
    star 4
    She is. Just because you, personally, don't like something doesn't change the fact that Ventress is currently a bounty hunter in official canon.
    Last edited by 07jonesj, Apr 5, 2013
  20. Watto Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Dec 13, 1998
    star 4
    Asajj is many things, but can be summarized with the word awesome... thanks to TCW. Another character with a great arc that benefited from the twists and turns you can get from serialized TV.

    Asajj and Ahsoka can always be brought back for more adventures, it doesnt have to be under TCW banner now that they're both independent parties.
  21. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    The Clone Wars ruined Asajj Ventress. She was conceived, and wonderfully portrayed in the Clone Wars Multimedia Project 2002-2005.
  22. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    Stupid picture not posting.
    Last edited by Garrett Atkins, Apr 5, 2013
  23. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    Yeah, no.
  24. Watto Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Dec 13, 1998
    star 4
    Where is that confounded "dislike" button... ;)

    I strongly disagree, if you can open your heart to the version of Asajj on TCW she really was entertaining, dynamic, and wonderfully portrayed. For folks who grew attached to the original Clone Wars EU though, I can understand having trouble opening up to the changes here.
  25. 07jonesj Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2010
    star 4
    How about you do something constructive for once? Instead of just stating that you hate this show and it's been done better before in every post you make, give suggestions on how it could have been done better.