Senate Pax watever-ia World/Global domination, an epic waste of time?

Discussion in 'Archive: The Senate Floor' started by Likewater, Mar 7, 2013.

  1. Likewater Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2009
    star 4
    Some mother Kriffers are always trying to iceskate up hill.- Weasly Snipes (alterd fro profanity)

    "Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot."- Carl Sagan

    Hegemony, Empire, Most by war, a few by trade, all end up the same scatterd broken and by large forgotten. If that empire is fortunate some third rate power donning its name like a shed skin.

    It's not enough to trade, but dominate trade! Secure total independence from whoever is holding something you need.

    Is it simple competativeness taken too far?

    Is it some quirk of human evolution that imprinteed a need to dominate deep withing the human psyche?

    Is it a learned trait?

    But after all the eventual collapse of various empires and hagemonies, people still try to build more. With the belief that God, technology, the cosmos, nature, justice, kittens are on their side and this time we'll do it right! but it always ends the same.
  2. A Chorus of Disapproval New Films Riot Deterrent

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Aug 19, 2003
    star 7
    Hooked On Phonics or Rosetta Stone: English would not have been an epic waste of time.
    V-2, GrandAdmiralJello and Lord Vivec like this.
  3. GrandAdmiralJello Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Nov 28, 2000
    star 10
    I want to say "bah, commies!" but this is a Senate thread, so... instead, I'll suggest that you're framed a rather curious question. Are you asking whether the lust for domination is a waste of time, or are you asking whether hegemony and empire are created primarily out of lust for domination?
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  4. SithLordDarthRichie London CR

    Chapter Rep
    Member Since:
    Oct 3, 2003
    star 8
    Total domination is arguably ultimately defeatist, competition on the whole brings the best out of everyone. One company having a market monopoly will ultimately lead to stifled innovation since they don't need to put the effort in to "beat" anyone anymore, which would can lead to consumers turning away and said company losing profit. This is whjy the free market has been so great in building the western world, it promotes competition and continued innovation.


    If you are a conqueror, what happens once you no longer have enemies to fight? Sometimes the fight was the only reason for conquering in the first place.

    What would have happened if the Nazis won WW2 and took over the world? With no-one left to clense and no-one fighting against him, would Hitler have got bored and disbanded it all? Would the desire for a Master Race have led to inbreeding/too small a genetic pool and ultimately destroyed the 1000 Year Reich?
    Hard to say, but history tells us no Empire is everlasting and no-one is dominant forever whether they be Human or Dinosaur or Cyborg from the future etc
  5. wannasee Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2007
    star 4
    If you look at it from the point of view that "time destroys all things" then yes, everything is a waste of time
    GrandAdmiralJello likes this.
  6. Ghost Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Oct 13, 2003
    star 6
    I'm not sure exactly what this thread is supposed to be about, @Likewater. Maybe it's better to talk about examples?


    Here's a list of some empires you might want to use as examples:


    The Achaemenid Empire and other Persian Empires
    [IMG]

    Alexander's Empire
    [IMG]

    Roman and Byzantine Empires
    [IMG][IMG]

    The Caliphates and Ottoman Empire
    [IMG][IMG]

    Mongol Empire
    [IMG]

    Portuguese Empire
    [IMG]

    Spanish Empire
    [IMG]

    Dutch Empire
    [IMG]

    French Empire
    [IMG]

    British Empire
    [IMG]

    Russian Empire and USSR
    [IMG]
  7. GrandAdmiralJello Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Nov 28, 2000
    star 10
    The whole "empires always fall" thing is pretty stupid. People always die too -- I guess there's no point to living, huh?
  8. Rogue_Ten Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2002
    star 7
    lmao you forgot the american empire
    V-2 likes this.
  9. Violent Violet Menace Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2004
    star 4
    You consider empire building as much a necessity as life itself? :confused:
  10. GrandAdmiralJello Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Nov 28, 2000
    star 10
    Yes that is clearly how analogies work.
  11. Emperor_Billy_Bob Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2000
    star 7
    You think Augustus Caesar, Alexander, or Napoleon would have enjoyed their life more as random nobodies?

    Call it the existential tragedy of absurd human life, if you will, but once you have reached past the subsistence point, there are only so many things to do in the world. Most of human life is dominated by the competition to amass material privilege (and thereby social privilege) and thereby domination over other humans.
    Last edited by Emperor_Billy_Bob, Mar 8, 2013
  12. Alpha-Red Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Apr 25, 2004
    star 5
    What would the American empire be anyway? Us and all our allies that may or may not listen to what we say?
    Summer Dreamer likes this.
  13. V-2 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Dec 10, 2012
    star 4
    All this alterd fro profanity!

    And the Chinese seem to be doing very well with theirs too.
  14. Violent Violet Menace Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2004
    star 4
    Yes, that is why I'm always disgusted and tune out whenever a politician starts talking about "national interests". Conceivably, the "national interests" of any one country on earth is for all other countries to eat **** and die, so that said country can then inherit the world and all its resources for itself.

    "And furthermore, it is my belief that Carthage should be destroyed."
    Last edited by Violent Violet Menace, Mar 8, 2013
  15. wannasee Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2007
    star 4
    It is a politician's duty to talk about national interests. What would you have them talk about?
  16. Violent Violet Menace Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2004
    star 4
    In an ideal world they'd be honest like the Romans, and say it straight: "It is my belief that Carthage should be destroyed". Why sugarcoat the law of the jungle?
    Last edited by Violent Violet Menace, Mar 8, 2013
  17. Rogue_Ten Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2002
    star 7
    how about all the developing world countries we've beg borrowed stolen or assassinated our way to dominion over?
    V-2 likes this.
  18. Emperor_Billy_Bob Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2000
    star 7

    Modern power plays just have to be cloaked in the tenets of liberalism.
  19. Violent Violet Menace Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2004
    star 4
    That's adorable. If history is any indication, usually, they may. Those who may not, usually don't "may not" for very long.
    Last edited by Violent Violet Menace, Mar 8, 2013
    V-2 likes this.
  20. wannasee Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2007
    star 4
    What is the source of this inanity? does anyone know?
  21. Emperor_Billy_Bob Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2000
    star 7
    What is the inanity?
  22. Rogue_Ten Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2002
    star 7
    frank appraisal of the behaviour of hegemons?
  23. wannasee Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2007
    star 4
    The inanity would be that "modern power plays just have to be cloaked in the tenets of liberalism."
  24. Emperor_Billy_Bob Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 9, 2000
    star 7
    The source is my brain....via my experience and a critical understanding of the world.
  25. wannasee Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2007
    star 4
    I'm not saying your comment is inane. I'm saying that the fact that "modern power plays have to be cloaked in the tenets of liberalism" is inane.