Quarterfinal #3: The RICHARDSONS (FORMERLY TEAM 4) vs. Literati

Discussion in 'Forum Feud' started by DarthIntegral, Aug 9, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Everton Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Jul 18, 2003
    star 10
    It's not an easy steal, by any means.
  2. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
  3. OBIWAN-JR Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2002
    star 6
    In which case, epic lost the coin toss!!

    :p

    *nods head feverishly, whilst turning outstretched hand from side to side*


    -JR :)
  4. OBIWAN-JR Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Oct 25, 2002
    star 6
    PM us the answer then...


    -JR :)
  5. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
  6. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
    Right, I'm sitting here dressed as a Leprechaun about to go to an Irish themed party. See ya guys later :)
  7. Lowbacca_1977 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 28, 2006
    star 6
    send me ideas team people!
  8. Onoto Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2004
    star 5
    Are we talking about genitalia, or is this some random British sports reference?
  9. DaenaBenjen42 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    May 15, 2005
    star 5
    I'm hoping for the sports reference...
  10. Darth_Brutus666 Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Dec 25, 2006
    star 4
  11. Onoto Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2004
    star 5
    I don't think anyone wants to hear any more about Roper's genitalia.
  12. DarthIntegral Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jul 13, 2005
    star 7
    Please be more specific. :p
  13. Onoto Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2004
    star 5
    It's clear that Lowbacca's first post following this warning should have contained the answer. Inty, as you are not following your own rules, I call for your dismissal and permanent banning. Such wild behavior cannot be tolerated.[face_plain]
  14. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
    Indeed. Lowbacca has broken the rules, and a "no answer" should be recorded.
  15. Lowbacca_1977 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 28, 2006
    star 6
    To be more specific, the idea sent to me was abusing/beating the children. As that's a subset of what I said before, that is a clarification.

    (I checked the last page on my way out of the house to work since there were no strikes when i'd gone to bed, and there was no celebration on the last page, figured that it was time to prepare to steal. Didn't find out there were ANY strikes til tonight post-work)
  16. Darth_Omega Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    May 19, 2002
    star 6
    I'm pretty sure that's the third answer :\
  17. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
    I'm not. Abuse is already up there.
  18. Darth_Brutus666 Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Dec 25, 2006
    star 4
    But it's of the wife, not children.
  19. George_Roper Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    May 1, 2005
    star 7
    My answer was Abuse, so if there was more than one kind he would have clarified.
  20. Darth_Brutus666 Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Dec 25, 2006
    star 4
    But the answer on the board says he abuses me.
  21. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
    Therefore Child Abuse will not be there :D

    [face_praying]

    I'd have said "he doesn't want kids"
  22. George_Roper Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    May 1, 2005
    star 7
    That's my point. If there were two abuse answers, he would have clarified when I said Abuse.
  23. SuperWatto Manager Emeritus

    Member Since:
    Sep 19, 2000
    star 5
    [face_thinking]
    Makes sense.

    In that case, your posting tactics have paid off - because we just looked at the board, not at all the messages from team RICHARDSONS...
  24. halibut Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 27, 2000
    star 8
    Say more things like that, George :D
  25. Onoto Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2004
    star 5
    Oh, victorious spam!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.