Actually, I'd say it very much does matter. If nobody respects the institution then you're just ****ing off with trying to 'keep it as it was'. It's like you think if marriage isn't used for procreation that society will spin out of control. So, what's the reason for keeping marriage benefits if it's a crap institution? It's not as if you magically gain the ability to have kids. Or pull a card that says you can become a mother now. Of course not. But we still follow an asinine primitive culture that views marriage and women as property. So I guess I can kind of see why a man would support it. Or at least a religious man. But outside of that you're just wasting your damn time trying to halt progress. Congratulations. You broke your own system, heathen. I kid, of course, but taking your standard to the extreme would mean your sister would have to either have gotten married again or had her children taken away--for her own safety, of course. But once she remarried she could have them back. Or you could've married her. It is ridiculous. Your point is ridiculous, but holding you to your own standard is only fair. Unless you choose to live your life in a morally objectionable way that isn't in accordance with the bible. Then you're scum of the Earth. I fixed it for you. Correct. You just seem to have a very outmoded idea of marriage and relationships.