My second biggest issue with RLM, behind the fact that they are full of inacurracies and anti-prequel propaganda as I like to call it, is that so many RLM supporters will appluad the reviews as deadly accurate in terms of tearing the movies to shreds. But then when the PT defenders start arguing against the reviews, the RLM supporters then turn their stance to "well, it is only parody" or "it was humor, can't you take a joke?" Bullocks. I know exactly what the reviews are, and that is sincere reviews with serious points that he is trying to make, but done so in a humorous way. If Plinkett mentions the issue of the protagonist (the point itself is serious), but he does so in a funny voice, might throw in a few funny words, and might edit in footage of some girl chained up in his basement, etc. At the end of the day they are serious reviews disguised as humor. Content = serious, but cosmetically it is humor.