We don't need to disprove something that has yet to be proven in the first place. If you stand by your claim that we haven't shown that God can't exist... then God is every bit as likely to exist as the flying spaghetti monster. I know how much theists hate that stupid monster being brought up, but that's exactly what you're worshipping! There is just as much validity to support the tooth fairy as God. The Great Pumpkin. Luke Skywalker. These figments have just as much validity as your precious GOD. These MAY also exist, but until you prove otherwise. Therefore I challenge you to prove your GOD over every other possible explanation. That means you'll have to disprove ALL possible imaginary creations, leaving only your one. Can you do it? Then keep your foolish God to yourself. Grow up! No, it should be treated as something which does not exist. If it can't be comprehended by humans, then you have nothing to indicate it's not just some figment of the imagination. We might as call GOD the FORCE. That make a lot more sense.