Lit Should we just stop referring to it as the EU?

Discussion in 'Literature' started by sith_rising, Aug 16, 2014.

  1. sith_rising Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 7, 2004
    star 4
    Since Disney is approaching all media (comics, TV shows, novels, games) as a single, uniform canon, should we even refer to new releases as Expanded Universe? Technically, it's all just Star Wars now.

    At least we won't have to deal with "EU is not canon" or "Clone Wars is not canon" or "Only Force Unleashed and Shadows of the Empire are canon" posts anymore.
  2. CooperTFN TFN EU Staff Emeritus

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 1999
    star 6
    I'm with you as far as new material is concerned, but many people here are stubbornly persistent in their use of "NEU".
    DelRiego and Ulicus like this.
  3. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    LOL. Good luck with that.

    The only way anyone is going to come around is when they realize that the only "real story" is the parts that I like.

    Of course there is always "Star Wars for you people who read", but that's a bit long.
    Zorrixor and Jedi Ben like this.
  4. CT-867-5309 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Jan 5, 2011
    star 5
    You're not naive enough to actually believe this?

    Yes, we will. We still are, it's not going to magically stop because of an announcement.
    Last edited by CT-867-5309, Aug 16, 2014
    Zorrixor, Jedi Ben, JackG and 3 others like this.
  5. GrandAdmiralJello Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Nov 28, 2000
    star 10
    Yes, it's not EU. That's pretty clear as a matter of policy.

    However, it's nice to have a term to refer to "things that are not the movies" -- hence NEU.
  6. sith_rising Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 7, 2004
    star 4
    I can see it's going to be a rough year for the die-hard old-school EU fans.
    EternalHero likes this.
  7. CooperTFN TFN EU Staff Emeritus

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 1999
    star 6
    The way I see it, there's not really any reason to do so anymore. That we're used to thinking that way reveals the truth that some part of us always understood that the non-movie stuff never really counted in the same way the movies did. I'm still cynical enough to believe that a movie will inevitably mess up a book someday, but for the time being I'm content to take them at face value and assume it all counts equally rather than try to mentally compartmentalize everything based solely on format.
    BigAl6ft6, JediDingo and Ulicus like this.
  8. GrandAdmiralJello Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Nov 28, 2000
    star 10
    How does it reveal anything? If we thought that the EU counted as much as the movies, we'd be crazy delusional fanboys/fangirls.

    More than we are already, I mean
  9. Vthuil Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 3, 2013
    star 4
    You clearly didn't spend a lot of time in the old EVII forums.
  10. Valin__Kenobi Author: Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Praji

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Mar 30, 2004
    star 4
    I've been using the abbreviation NU ... New Universe. It's more streamlined than NEU, parallel to the two-letter LU/Legends Universe, and it avoids the dreaded adjective "Expanded".
    Riv_Shiel and Abadacus like this.
  11. Jeff_Ferguson Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    May 15, 2006
    star 4
    This. We needn't kid ourselves. There will still be the movies, and then everything else. I vote for calling everything else the "OJ." It stands for "Other junk."
    Zorrixor likes this.
  12. CooperTFN TFN EU Staff Emeritus

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 1999
    star 6
    A) we are.
    B) allow me to direct your attention to every single time in the last three months someone has said "but they said it was canon last time!"
    kubricklynch likes this.
  13. Kablob Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jul 24, 2014
    star 4
    But it wasn't G-canon, it was C-canon and T-canon and S-canon and probably Q-canon for all I know.
    Last edited by Kablob, Aug 16, 2014
  14. GrandAdmiralJello Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Nov 28, 2000
    star 10
    Yes, and they were. None of those people were under the illusion that they were the same as the films though. That's precisely WHY everyone got up in arms about things like TCW, because they knew Lucas could erase/contradict the EU at a whim and the EU had to just take it.

    Like, you've been in the fandom long enough. You remember when EU was just apocryphal, period. The only continuity the EU had was with itself, and that was mostly a publishing rule. It wasn't until the canon tiers came out that we could say that EU was canon, and even then it was definitionally inferior to the films -- it just counted officially, is all.

    Canon was Lucasfilm's term, not the EU fandom's. Stop blaming us :p
    Last edited by GrandAdmiralJello, Aug 16, 2014
    Riv_Shiel and Zorrixor like this.
  15. CooperTFN TFN EU Staff Emeritus

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 1999
    star 6
    I'm not blaming anyone, but I'm referring to people who talk about the new system as if the language LFL is using now is the same language they used last time and they somehow betrayed that by rebooting--it's fine to be disappointed, but not to pretend we'd been lied to for the last twenty years.

    But now that you mention it, can I just blame you, like, personally? These conversations would go so much more smoothly that way.
    Jedi Princess and Vthuil like this.
  16. Zeta1127 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 2, 2012
    star 4
    LFL already made such declarations of canonization like we were given back in April, inherently meaningless when Darth Maul was revived in TCW, or arguable with the creation of TCW itself. It seems to me like we actually were lied to, at least by the LFL marketing machine, because Lucas was the only one who ever really said the EU wasn't the real story. I mean, it was always the prerogative of film and TV to ignore the EU as they saw fit, so why even bother formally declaring what is canon?
    kubricklynch likes this.
  17. CooperTFN TFN EU Staff Emeritus

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Jul 8, 1999
    star 6
  18. CT-867-5309 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Jan 5, 2011
    star 5

    You have my support, as long as I get to call it "the juice".
    anakinfansince1983 likes this.
  19. Jedi Ben Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Jul 19, 1999
    star 6
    [face_laugh][face_rofl][face_laugh]

    .... Oh, you were serious?
    Zorrixor likes this.
  20. Grey1 Host: 181st Imperial Discussion Group

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2000
    star 4
    All those years, I never used Expanded Universe as "Alternate Universe", or "Not Really Counting Universe". Just as Expanded. And that it did. So for me, it was more of a complimentary universe/bag-of-fiction. This time around, this bag-of-fiction is supposedly reigned in much more, because there's new borders this time around.

    Last time Zahn wasn't allowed to delve into Clone Wars lore because there were possibly going to be movies about that at one point, but giving kids to the Solos and eventually to Luke was okay. As was killing off movie characters like Chewbacca. Then the rules changed and the future of the movie heroes (including potential children) was off-limits as well, so now they start over again. If, at this point, we only had EU sources up to ROTJ, or if the pre-OT EU had been more clearly seperated from the post-OT EU, they might have only declared one part non-canon, but it was too much hassle so they kind of started over from scratch.

    So, it's a different thing - I wouldn't give the same name to it (therefore people come up with stuff like NEU). I agree that the complimentary nature is somewhat different this time around, since the movies and TV shows will do so much expanding of the universe that comic books and novels will not be so outrageous in their invention of new stuff. But it will still kind of expand the SW universe in secondary media, so I don't really see a change in "this time they swear it's canon". The canon aspect isn't determining whether it's expanding or not.

    So, if anything, I think it needs a different name because it's a different thing. Kind of. Seeing how much might be salvaged after all (lots of concepts, less actual stories). "Other Junk" sounds quite catchy, I would have gone for "Novels, comic books and video games, you know, that kind of stuff".
  21. Zorrixor Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Sep 8, 2004
    star 6
    True, because this time when G-Canon Canon ignores C-Canon Canon, Disney will have no excuse to fall back on other than admitting: "Er, yeah, so, about all those books being equal to the films...? You believed that? Hahahaha."
    Last edited by Zorrixor, Aug 17, 2014
  22. Grey1 Host: 181st Imperial Discussion Group

    VIP
    Member Since:
    Nov 21, 2000
    star 4
    Well, they'll probably say nothing at all because the stuff sells either way, will they? "So, yeah, the move novelizations are canon, that should be clear. If they do not contradict what's on the screen. We're not actually saying it, but the meaning should be clear. Well, we do not actually mean it, but..."
  23. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    I have no idea what Lucas said about canon in the early 90s, I wasn't paying much attention to Star Wars then, but my theory is that he came up with G-canon, C-canon, T-canon, GTFO-canon, etc. to cover for the fact that he changes his mind all the time.

    "Oh, I didn't actually mean that that was the real story."

    Yeah you did, last week. This week Obi-Wan and Owen are not brothers. Next week Anakin actually will have met Yoda.
    Ackbar's Fishsticks and Zorrixor like this.
  24. JediKnight75 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2011
    star 3
    I think it depends on how you interpret the term EU. If it means things that are of lesser canon than it makes sense to abandon it. If you interpret it as things outside of the movies -- regardless of canonical status -- that expands outside of what the majority of fans see, then keeping EU is logical. I have always preferred the latter, mainly because that's how I interpreted the label. The books and comics just happened to be at a lower canon level, which I never perceived as the reason behind the EU category. Thus I'll keep using EU; these books and comics still go beyond what the main Star Wars audience will see and thus the yexpand the universe. Now the EU just happens to be on the same level as the films and TV shows.
    Last edited by JediKnight75, Aug 17, 2014
    Riv_Shiel and Valin__Kenobi like this.
  25. JediDingo Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Mar 27, 2005
    star 3
    Are we beginning to question our entire existence? I feel like we are.