[image=http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00003CXXJ.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg] [image=http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00005JMQZ.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg] AND [hl=white]SHREK THE THIRD[/hl] Shrek 1: When I saw the trailer for the original Shrek, I didn't expect a big blockbuster. It unlike the second didn't sell out and focused more on the fantasy and fairy tales. Shrek 1 pretty much has the beauty in the eye of the beholder. This movie is also one of adventure. The standard rescue the damsel with a twist. Shrek 2: This is definitely a more Hollywood-esque film. When I first saw it, I felt a different taste in my mouth than Shrek. You have the introduction of five new characters, who are somewhat okay. I like Charming and Puss in Boots. Fairy Godmother is a mere shadow of Farrquad. Fiona's parents aren't that great either, but still get the job done in this movie. What really turned me away was Shrek losing his ogre self and Donkey becoming a stalilion. You can say that this movie is more about acceptance and was definitely a good babysitting tool in 04. Shrek the Third: First of all, bad title. But it does fit the plotline with King Arthur. What we had from Shrek 2 will dominate this movie. I'm sure we return to Far, Far Away and we've heard rumors that Justin Timberlake is playing Arthur. That was definitely hinted in Shrek 2 with the Sir Justin poster on the wall. I really don't have huge hopes for it. Somebody else may think it otherwise.