I noticed that the line of argument was very much 'we cannot change users sigs'. This seems odd to me since I have, previously, had my signature censored and edited without my prior consent. I also understand that some other members have had their sigs edited also. This is mainly due to their signatures containing spoilers and then the user posting in the non-spoiler section. How can the JC administration respond therefore to such an obvious dichotomy between historical truth and current pretense? I would suggest that the complete post deletion was either a malicious act or an act of ignorance.