Well, that's all well and good, but I think they've taken things too far. Their way is now virtually the only way (practically speaking). A [link=http://www.msnbc.com/news/777023.asp]column[/link] on MSNBC.com helped illustrate the RIAA's strategies. Here's an excerpt: So why are the record labels taking such a hard line? My guess is that it?s all about protecting their Internet-challenged business model. Their profit comes from blockbuster artists. If the industry moved to a more varied ecology, independent labels and artists would thrive?to the detriment of the labels, which would have trouble rustling up the rubes to root for the next Britney. The smoking gun comes from testimony of an RIAA-backed economist who told the government fee panel that a dramatic shakeout in Webcasting is ?inevitable and desirable because it will bring about market consolidation.? The record industry, with the help of Congress and the Copyright Office, may indeed make a shakeout inevitable. But I doubt that Jim Atkinson and his fellow independent Webcasters find the prospect of their extinction terribly desirable. Nor do the 77 million Americans who have at one time tuned in to Web radio and perhaps found something not featured on the lobotomized playlists of broadcast radio. If enough of those outraged listeners stream their objections to legislators, maybe Internet radio can be saved.