He understands it perfectly well. But he didn't make his comments out of the blue. He made it in rebuttal to your false claim that directing tax cuts towards the rich would result in a significant boost in venture capital for new, important start-ups. As he pointed out, that's not true. Now that we all acknowledge that, do you have some other reason why it would make sense to direct tax cuts towards the rich? Again, what is your rationale for wanting to do this? What are you trying to accomplish? The first part of establishing whether something is a good policy is looking at whether it even does the job you created it for. That sort of implies you have a goal in the first place. So then?