main
side
curve
  1. In Memory of LAJ_FETT: Please share your remembrances and condolences HERE

JCC The All-New, All-Different JCC Astronomy Thread

Discussion in 'Community' started by jp-30, Jul 16, 2010.

  1. Lowbacca_1977

    Lowbacca_1977 Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Jun 28, 2006
    I'd say I don't see a benefit to officially deciding that the United States will be withdrawing from the field of astronomy for half a generation.

    Not to mention that it's not that this is a proposed thing being cut, the majority of the telescope has been built already, so scraping it now ignores that we've invested a lot of money already that gets thrown away if we abandon it. It's not as though we have a robust space program that's getting pruned down, we have a battered space program that's seen it's share of funding go from over 5% in the 1960s to a fair bit under 1% now.
     
  2. jp-30

    jp-30 Manager Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2000
    That's some of the best trivia I've heard in ages.

    Happy Birthday Neptune... orbit... discovery... err.
     
  3. Healer_Leona

    Healer_Leona Squirrel Wrangler of Fun & Games star 9 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Jul 7, 2000
    Facinating!
     
  4. Ghost

    Ghost Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Oct 13, 2003
    Yeah, it is pretty cool.

    What about land-based telescopes?

    Government cancels things we're already invested in all the time, unfortunately. But maybe cancelling the telescope could free up funds for other NASA projects. Or encourage the private sector to step up.

    I think NASA as a whole needs to be reformed, given a new mission. Scientists have for years wondered if we could have space-based solar power... put huge satellites in orbit that collect solar energy, that is then beamed down to Earth using microwave transmissions for use as electricity. Instead of continuing to speculate about it, let's put NASA to work in figuring out how to do it, and get it done within 10-15 years. Then NASA could actually make a small profit, for providing energy needs to the United States and other countries, and with that profit they could fund research-based initiatives like the Webb Space Telescope, missions to explore the Solar System, maybe even get a small base on the Moon and a man on Mars.
     
  5. Lowbacca_1977

    Lowbacca_1977 Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Jun 28, 2006
    On the first part.... with the current technology, and barring some breakthroughs on AO, the James Webb would be a better telescope than any earth-based telescopes I'm aware of. There's hopes to improve earth-based tech enough for that, but nothing certain to my knowledge.

    On the second part, I'm not sure how one would expect universities to afford the access being suggested there with private sector involvement. Particularly public universities.
     
  6. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  7. Ghost

    Ghost Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Oct 13, 2003
    This is pretty cool, a huge mass of water floating around in outer space has been discovered, 34 billion times the mass of Earth.

    [image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/07/25/t1larg.quasar.nasa.jpg]
     
  8. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  9. jp-30

    jp-30 Manager Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2000
    You SHUD be sligty worride.
     
  10. Ghost

    Ghost Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Oct 13, 2003
    Apparently there's now the possibility of flowing liquid water on Mars during the planet's springtime...
     
  11. Lowbacca_1977

    Lowbacca_1977 Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Jun 28, 2006
    I'm so very pleased that I called that news story at work the day before it was announced.
     
  12. EHT

    EHT Manager Emeritus star 7 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Sep 13, 2007
  13. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  14. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  15. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  16. DantheJedi

    DantheJedi Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Aug 23, 2009
    I say we fire up the Jupiter 2 and send the Robinson family there!

    (Unless they get lost on the way.....)
     
  17. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  18. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  19. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
    EUROPA

    I wonder what the pressure would be like at the bottom of a 100 mile deep ocean on a small world like this.

     
  20. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Meet Curiosity

    [image=http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/8/2011/11/9c1b38d62f0280455dfcc3d6c4233ab9.jpg]

    2,000 pounds on its way to Mars today.

    [image=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Mars_Science_Laboratory_wheels.jpg/799px-Mars_Science_Laboratory_wheels.jpg]
     
  21. jp-30

    jp-30 Manager Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2000
    Security camera films meteor!

    http://www.wimp.com/camerameteor/
     
  22. Everton

    Everton Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Jul 18, 2003
    So erm... what are chances of anything coming from Mars? :p
     
  23. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
  24. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
    2 EARTH SIZED WORLDS FOUND

    The smaller of the two is stil 1.7 times the mass of the Earth but one of them is actually smaller in size.
     
  25. Ghost

    Ghost Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Oct 13, 2003
    There are probably billions/trillions of Earth-sized worlds in the Milky Way. It's not really news to discover extrasolar planets anymore, unless they're in the habitable zone for liquid water, and not too too far away. :p Even then, we have a few of those now.