Discussion in 'Community' started by -Courtney-, Nov 25, 2006.
Finger puppets? They look like bespoke condoms!
Yeah I'm seeing DOS in 2D for sure.
2D is the way to go for any movie
That was initially my stance for AUJ. Then I ended up seeing it a second time in HFR 3D. But I have to say the 2D showing was fine.
I didn't see AUJ in 3D due to the negative hype surrounding it. I'm kinda curious, but I just don't want to waste money on something that's potentially not worth it.
I'm going 48 FPS 3D.
But then, I'm one of those "crazy kids."
I would love to have 48 FPS, but I don't think there are many good ones for the PS3.
48fps 3D for me. I loved AUJ in that format, and frankly can't wait for another dose.
Hollywood reporter says that Jackson has spent $561 million (USD) on the hobbit trilogy to date, meaning the final production costs will likely be well over $600 million. Not too much considering the likely ROI, but damn.
As a recovering FPS addict I approve this message.
GET IT AHAHAHHAAHAHHAHA
First look at the human face of Beorn. Something of the 1980s about him, I think.
Erm... Conan the Barbearian?
The amount of nitpicking the hell out of AUJ and complaining about the format is...well, you know...
That really should be in spoiler tags,
I didn't know Ahunuld was in these now.
"Dammit Smaug! You got what you wanted! Give dos people da mountain!"
Beauty and the Beorn
Just mix and add a hemp jacket to obtain your Beorn...
Well said and if peter jackson release them without the 48 per frame rate, crittics would love the unexpected journey and the whole trilogy more!
I hope sometime in the future they can do silmarillon movies!
And here's Beorn as a kid
Who's Beorn? Swedish Chef on steroids?
He is a human than can turn into a bear
That's so stupid.