PT Was Darth Maul really Necessary?

Discussion in 'Prequel Trilogy' started by Polydroxol, Feb 11, 2014.

Moderators: Bazinga'd
  1. I Are The Internets Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Nov 20, 2012
    star 7
  2. May_The_Force_Be_With_You Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2014
    star 1
    Was he necessary to the plot? Absolutely.

    Was he utilized well in the PT? Meh - I guess.
  3. Zer0 Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Sep 3, 2012
    star 3
    Yes he was necessary, but he should've at least hung around until Episode 2, Dooku still would've worked and you'd have two badasses running around.
  4. Darth Dominikkus Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Apr 5, 2013
    star 3
    But you always need to keep the "rule of two";)
  5. Darth Maul Apprentice Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Jan 27, 2014
    star 4
    Yeah, you could've introduced Dooku in TPM. Read Darth Plagueis, Palps and him converse several times. Although not having him there adds to the mystery of the story by the time AOTC arrives. Plus did we really need another character in TPM, there were a ton of new characters in the film. Dooku is more of a political figure/teacher, not an assassin/warrior type. Which is what Maul does so well. So yeah, I think Maul was necessary.
    darth ladnar and Iron_lord like this.
  6. TX-20 Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Jun 21, 2013
    star 3
    I honestly never thought about it from this perspective. I love all of this. ^:)^
    Last edited by TX-20, Feb 21, 2014
  7. SithStarSlayer Manager Emeritus

    Member Since:
    Oct 23, 2003
    star 6
    <------ I abolished that rule a long, long time ago.[face_devil]
  8. PMT99 Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Nov 23, 2000
    star 4
    Yes, Darth Maul was absolutely necessary.

    He could've been the main villain of the prequals had George not killed him off too early. Maul would've also been the leader of the Separatists instead of Dooku and he'd be instrumental in Anakin's fall to the dark side (especially by ROTS).
  9. Darth Dominikkus Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Apr 5, 2013
    star 3
    I guess rules can be broken...[face_laugh]
    SithStarSlayer likes this.
  10. Sandtrooper92 Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Jul 31, 2013
    star 2
    I agree that the introduction of Dooku was awkward. The slaying of Maul was even more awkward.

    Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2
  11. I Are The Internets Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Nov 20, 2012
    star 7
    Mod corruption! I'm reporting you to the Mod Squad.
    Darth Dominikkus likes this.
  12. Cushing's Admirer Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2006
    star 6
    I always read Maul as filler. His handling was very poor. Does he have the potential to be key, yes. Is he, no.

    Regarding Dooku, going by the films I don't see him as political at all. Nor a figurehead. He was disenchanted (with cause) and used.
    Last edited by Cushing's Admirer, Feb 25, 2014
  13. The_Phantom_Calamari Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Nov 10, 2011
    star 4

    Except Palpatine is Anakin's master. Palpatine is the one who seduces Anakin over to the dark side and ultimately enslaves him. Introducing another villain to drive Anakin's fall to the dark side would only serve to dilute the dramatic heft of Anakin's final confrontation against Palpatine in Episode VI.

    The villains of the prequels are just pawns in Palpatine's grand scheme, and that was by design. Lucas wasn't setting out to create new iconic symbols of evil, because he already had one, and that was enough.
    Last edited by The_Phantom_Calamari, Feb 25, 2014
    darth ladnar likes this.
  14. I Are The Internets Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Nov 20, 2012
    star 7
    I feel like Maul has become overexposed now.
  15. Darth Maul Apprentice Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Jan 27, 2014
    star 4
    I hear what you're saying Cush, but Maul is never filler. :D

    Whaaaat? He was going around trying to get every system hooked up with the Separatists. That's political, just not in the senate. Disenchanted? Yes. Used? I think he knew what he was doing. He knew what Sidious was up to. He told Obi-Wan so. I think he was the most aware of what was going on other than Sidious.
  16. Jarren_Lee-Saber Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Apr 16, 2008
    star 4
    I really hate questions about entertainment that use the word "necessary". Its entertainment! Its whole existence is not "necessary". :oops:
    Samnz likes this.
  17. Among the Clouds Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    May 18, 2001
    star 4
    I think that Darth Maul is essential the same as Dooku, and we get a good enough sense of what Maul was... the new face of the Sith. Not only was Sidious the Phantom Menace, but so was Maul. A new threat that had not been dealt with in a millennium and seemingly came out of nowhere. In the end, though, I think Maul's part in the films was pretty well established. He's a character we don't need to know too much about. He's mysterious, he's evil, and we already know he's the Sith apprentice. It's sort of like the Joker in The Dark Knight. The film focuses on Batman and Harvey Dent's arcs, but the Joker is in the film simply to wreck havoc in the middle of it all. A distraction to the real actions at play with the longer-term consequences.

    At the same time, Dooku should have been seen briefly in TPM (or at least discussed) in order to give the character a more well-rounded story. The brief dialogue we hear about him in AotC says very little and leaves the viewer with more questions than answers. Dooku could have certainly been dealt with in a better fashion.
  18. Cushing's Admirer Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2006
    star 6
    @Darth Maul Apprentice: Fancy seeing you here! :p :D

    :p Honestly, I think all the 'Dark Ones' could've been done better, particularly Maul. I got the intention but it doesn't work for me.

    For me, no, Dooku isn't political simply because he supposedly did that. I said he was used, Maul, I by no means said he was completely unaware. He wasn't stupid. Yet, his disenchantment was twisted and used by Sidious just as Anakin's was. Dooku likewise trusted Sidious that's clear in RotS, I do not think his heart was Sith.
    Darth Maul Apprentice likes this.
  19. Darth Maul Apprentice Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Jan 27, 2014
    star 4
    Har har Cush. Just like anything there are degrees, and Dooku was Sith. Maybe not as dark as Lord Sidious, but Sith none the less.
    Iron_lord likes this.
  20. Cushing's Admirer Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2006
    star 6
    I understand that's how most see it. However, not me.
  21. MOC Yak Face Moderator, Classic Trilogy

    Manager
    Member Since:
    Jan 6, 2004
    star 4
    I've always felt that having both Maul and Dooku as Sith apprentices resulted in neither of them being particularly well utilised in the role. In my fantasy PT, they both appear in all three films, but Maul is the Sith apprentice and Dooku is the influential, respected face of the Separatists, but not a Sith. They could both have been better developed that way.
  22. DARTHVENGERDARTHSEAR Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2002
    star 4
    The question should be was Dooku necessary. Maul should have had more lines, had more exposure, and survived until episode III. He could have been as iconic as Vader. Oh well.
    Darth Maul Apprentice likes this.
  23. Force Smuggler Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Sep 2, 2012
    star 6
    There should have been Maul or Dooku, not both.
    Whoever was left would have characteristics from both characters though.
  24. Garrett Atkins Jedi Grand Master

    Member Since:
    Feb 11, 2013
    star 4
    That would be interesting but hard to incorporate.
  25. Force Smuggler Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Sep 2, 2012
    star 6
    Master political speaker with combat experience on the side. Some things would be taken out but could still work.
Moderators: Bazinga'd