main
side
curve
  1. In Memory of LAJ_FETT: Please share your remembrances and condolences HERE

PT Why is the Jedi not being a celibate organization a problem?

Discussion in 'Prequel Trilogy' started by Thiazzi, Aug 13, 2015.

  1. Thiazzi

    Thiazzi Jedi Padawan star 1

    Registered:
    Jul 27, 2015
    I've gone through some threads, specifically ones concerning the Jedi Order's allowance of sexual intercourse by its members either inside or outside the Order itself, and the general consensus seems to be against this. The main arguments I've seen presented detail the contradictions in Jedi philosophy that non-celibacy evinces: "If Jedi aren't allowed to love, what if a female Jedi has a child? Must it be demanded that she sever all emotional ties with said child?" or "The Order imposes a rule that forbids attachment, yet allows sexual intercourse? Why is that okay? Sex without genuine love is simply pleasure and lust, and the Jedi shouldn't be allowed these boons!" I find the latter argument rather archaic and ridiculous, but I will explore that later.

    That Jedi can have sex seems to be (in a rare case, :p), one of the Order's sagely prudent decisions since its foundation: the Jedi are mortals, and are thus susceptible to the urges that mortals often indulge themselves to, even though they spend years attempting to subdue those urges through training; however, I do not think that the lust for sex is an urge that would lead one to the dark side, nor do I believe that a Jedi would have a difficult time regulating the extent of a sexual relation in terms of an attachment forming and posing a risk to the Jedi's moral and ethical code. So that Jedi are allowed to release whatever frustration that a lack of satisfying lust could pose (as sexual attraction is perhaps more a physical-dependent issue than a mental-dependent one), seems like an intelligent cautionary allowance that has perhaps saved more Jedi from the dark side than it has sacrificed to the dark side.

    The argument that labels the Jedi unreliable heathens for tolerating coitus is, as stated before, archaic, as I believe it derives from our world's moral customs and ideals regarding pre-martial sex instead of the in-universe information. This whole belief that one shouldn't have sex without loving their partner is outdated and backwards. Prostitution is called the world's oldest profession for a reason, and it should be embraced (but I'm sounding like a hypocrite, alluding to my personal world views, eek), because it offers a release and a non-commital facet for this release, which I would believe is essential for a Jedi's faithfulness to the Order and the light side of the Force. The Jedi are also shown as being quite apathetic at times, nearly callously so, but this is purely an outside misconception, as compassion is encouraged by the Code; so while I believe a pregnant female Jedi would face a small struggle with surrendering a child -or aborting a fetus-, she would ultimately embrace the indifferent teachings of the Jedi Order and move past that potential roadblock.

    I don't know, maybe I just really enjoy the idea of the Jedi getting down and dirty with no strings attached, or perhaps I'm simply confused by the apparent contradiction that sex in the Jedi Order arouses, for I see no reason why it should. Thoughts?
     
  2. Lulu Mars

    Lulu Mars Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Only one: I agree :)
     
    Andy Wylde and Thiazzi like this.
  3. Cushing's Admirer

    Cushing's Admirer Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Why I refuse to accept this is because it suggests the Jedi have very low standards indeed and they are so afraid of emotion to forbid attachment so I don't think they should get away with sex without caring/standards.
     
  4. Lulu Mars

    Lulu Mars Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Why is sex without emotional attachment low?
    And how does caring require emotional attachment? I care about people that I'm not emotionally attached to.
     
  5. Thiazzi

    Thiazzi Jedi Padawan star 1

    Registered:
    Jul 27, 2015

    It suggests nothing of the sort. That's an insinuation; what if the Jedi merely have sex with other Jedi? Are the Jedi low standard, as your claim would imply?

    It isn't about them being able to 'get away' with anything: having casual sex isn't something to 'get away' with. And once again, you're projecting your ideals onto the Jedi: sex is an intimate act, yes, but not necessarily one that forges deep, personal, everlasting bonds. I'd hasten to say it makes more sense that casual sex is allowed in the Jedi Order, as, logically, most sex is loveless (prostitution comment aforementioned). You don't have to care about someone to have sex with them, is the main point, which is why it makes sense for the Jedi Order to allow it.
     
    Andy Wylde likes this.
  6. Valairy Scot

    Valairy Scot Manager Emeritus star 6 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Sep 16, 2005
    I think IRL considerations inform how folks view this, not in-universe reasons. Too many folks believe that whatever they believe has to be a part of a fictional universe and/or guide other folk's behavior in our world.
     
  7. darth-sinister

    darth-sinister Manager Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Jun 28, 2001
    The fact is in the real world, people have sex without attachment all the time. You'd be surprised at how often it happen. Look no further than prostitution and pornography. Sex for money, putting on a performance and no love at all. Few in the adult industry are married, or involved in a relationship with their fellow sexual partners. People outside of those professions are known for doing it as well.

    It isn't low to have sex without marriage, or a stable relationship. The world doesn't work that way.
     
  8. Obi-John Kenobi

    Obi-John Kenobi Jedi Master star 3

    Registered:
    Oct 30, 2012


    Prostitution and pornography are hardly the paragons of society. I would hope the Jedi aspire to more than that.


    My overall thoughts on this are: Lucas should've just come out and said that Jedi are to be celibate, if for no other reason than to keep wise acre fanboys from using the whole "Jedi can have as much meaningless sex as they want! Whatta life!!!" routine.

    I doubt that's the message Lucas was trying to convey to impressionable young people. But I think the point Lucas was making is sex in and of itself doesn't make a Jedi "impure". It's not like the Knights of the Roundtable or whatever, where they were expected to remain as pure as possible. Having sex wouldn't automatically expel you from the Jedi order. But, the problem with that reasoning is, it looks like you're discouraging a normal,healthy relationship and encouraging screwing around with no attachments.
     
  9. Thiazzi

    Thiazzi Jedi Padawan star 1

    Registered:
    Jul 27, 2015

    I don't see what you mean by this. The Jedi having casual sex is just what it is, casual sex. It doesn't mean they can't form healthy relationships, attachment withheld, just because they're intimate at times with others. Sex doesn't have to be the catalyst for the conception of a passionate relationship, just as sex isn't always passionate. It's a pleasure for some, and something more for others. I think you're seeing it in a very black and white way, which is unfortunate, because the Jedi being able to have sex could expose many potential flaws and hypocrisy within the Order, which would explain why they were so exposed and corrupt by the time of the Purge.
     
    Andy Wylde and Alienware like this.
  10. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    My take on this: the Jedi's sexual activities are none of anyone else's business. The Council knows this.

    Their attachments are the business of the Council, because their attachments cause them to put the object of their attachment above the greater good--at best; at worst, it causes them to do really stupid ****.

    Which is, you know, what the PT is about. The Jedi who had unattached sex were not the ones turning to the Dark Side.

    As far as why people have a problem with that: Valairy nailed it. People who believe that sex MUST BE within the boundaries of marriage or a committed relationship lest it be "impure" are going to project that on the Jedi; in other words, people who believe that casual sex is "dirty" or "bad" are going to believe that Jedi who are not celibate are "dirty" or "bad."

    People do have casual sex, friends with benefits relationships, etc., all the time, and they are not porn stars or prostitutes. I see no need to make the Jedi follow some puritanical rule about celibacy, a rule about celibacy that was invented long before modern birth control--which, Anakin and Padme aside, I assume the GFFA has access to. I don't think Jedi needed to be concerned about breaking the "there is no emotion, only peace" mantra by worrying about whether the crocodile dung or pennyroyal tea was going to fail.

    I mostly agree with the OP. I don't get any enjoyment out of imagining Jedi having casual sex, because I don't care, which brings me back to my first statement: if they are having sex without breaking the no-attachment rule, it's none of anyone else's business.
     
  11. GuardianSoulBlade

    GuardianSoulBlade Jedi Knight star 3

    Registered:
    May 26, 2015
    I'll leave my Christian IRL beliefs out of this and just talk regarding in universe. The reason we don't like the idea of just writing Jedi as people who have one night stands and flings is because of one thing: pairings. We like our pairings, no matter what, we like seeing people who have deep attachments to each other have sex. Just writing flings and one night stands forJedi characters isn't any fun, because we like seeing characters have connections with each other.
     
    Lady_Misty likes this.
  12. Valairy Scot

    Valairy Scot Manager Emeritus star 6 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Sep 16, 2005
    That's fine, but isn't it possible to have a connection with a sex partner but without "being paired"?

    Sure, it's Legends and I don't necessarily subscribe to this, but in Wild Space and its sequels we find out that one of Obi-Wan's long time Jedi friends was for a short time his lover as well. They "came together when they needed each other" and reverted back to friendship when "it was time."

    So there was a connection - more than "lust" it would appear or a one night stand - and yet it never developed into a romantic relationship. Yoda was okay with it as Obi-Wan hadn't "lost himself" within that relationship.

    Of course Anakin was pissed to the max when he figured it out (like a decade or so after the fact).
     
  13. Lulu Mars

    Lulu Mars Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 10, 2005
    From a narrative entertainment point of view, casual sex isn't very interesting in and of itself, no - unless you're into pornography, but that's usually not what Star Wars is about.
    However, everything doesn't have to be viewed as potential story material. Lucas just said that the Jedi aren't celibate and left it at that. It was a simple matter of explaining how Force sensitive individuals keep popping up in the GFFA: Force sensitives reproduce. I'm sure the Jedi see it not only as a necessity, but as a thing of beauty; the miracle of life! After all, that's what they're about. Without life, the Force would not exist. The body creates the spirit, not the other way around. Jedi love life and sexual relations are an essential part of the package that should be embraced. No need to make something dirty out of it.

    With all that said, I wouldn't necessarily mind a story that deals with issues that could potentially arise from this, like a Jedi falling in love with a fellow Jedi after sex and/or becoming attached to their offspring.
     
  14. darth-sinister

    darth-sinister Manager Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Jun 28, 2001
    I didn't say that prostitution and pornography were paragons of society. But being a paragon doesn't stop one from having sex without love and attachment. I don't think Jedi go out and pay for sex. But it wouldn't be surprising if Mace Windu didn't engage in intercourse with say, Aayla Secura or Adi Gallia simply just to do so. To fulfill whatever physical needs that needed to be met. Done in one. No pillow talk, no cuddling, no walk of shame. Get up and out the door and back to business.

    He did. Back during the London premiere of AOTC, the question came up and Lucas said that they are not celibate.

    "Jedi Knights aren't celibate - the thing that is forbidden is attachments - and possessive relationships."
     
  15. Thiazzi

    Thiazzi Jedi Padawan star 1

    Registered:
    Jul 27, 2015

    They say the ladies have another name for Mace... Shaft. :cool:

    (Not my joke, but hilarious to me anyway.)
     
    Andy Wylde likes this.
  16. VadersLaMent

    VadersLaMent Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Apr 3, 2002
    30 million worlds, quadrillions of sentient beings, a galactic internet. They probably have more porn in a GFFA than we have collected information of our entire real world Earth.
     
    Andy Wylde likes this.
  17. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    I think the past two posts might be contributing to the "casual sex is bad/dirty/not a choice of real adults worthy of taking seriously" mindset.

    Let's not.

    There are people who view sex as a physical act separate from loving committed relationships, who also neither view people as objects nor view sexual activity as the subject of wink-wink-nudge-nudge jokes.
     
  18. Thiazzi

    Thiazzi Jedi Padawan star 1

    Registered:
    Jul 27, 2015

    Calm down, no one was viewing anyone as an object.
     
  19. Alexrd

    Alexrd Chosen One star 6

    Registered:
    Jul 7, 2009
    While one could argue that there's nothing that forbids Jedi from having sex, I don't think casual sexual relations with random strangers are part of the Jedi's way of life.

    Yes, sex is a part of life, just like forming a family, but it's not a necessity. The Jedi chose another path.

    I agree.
     
    Obi-John Kenobi likes this.
  20. Lulu Mars

    Lulu Mars Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Wait a minute. "discouraging a normal,healthy relationship"?
    There are many forms of healthy relationships. Do you know what they all have in common? This: Those who are in those relationships are perfectly comfortable with their situation.
    That's it.

    Different strokes for different folks!
     
  21. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Exactly. There is nothing abnormal or unhealthy about a casual sex or friends-with-benefits relationship when both parties understand and are comfortable with those terms.
     
    Lulu_Mars likes this.
  22. Obi-John Kenobi

    Obi-John Kenobi Jedi Master star 3

    Registered:
    Oct 30, 2012
    You seem to be misinterpreting my quote. (I frankly don't know why that happens with such regularity here) Again,Lucas quotes doesn't seem to be advocating "random hook-ups". The problem is, people will read into it what they will.

    Now the first thing that happens is everyone saying "This is the GFFA, leave your religious beliefs at the door", but the fact is the Jedi IS a religion as we're told in the actual OT. So it is fairly strange to see the Jedi engage in "random hook-ups" for the sake of it. You could say "Every Friday the Jedi have group nude sit ins and commune with the Force." And people will say "Yeah there are nudists in real life. This is completely normal." But for 98% of the world, having our co-workers sit side by side with us in the nude is anathema. The same can be said of Jedi putting a post on the Temple bulletin board advertising for his evening's potential entertainment. It's virtually Impossible to divorce the "ick factor" from such goings on in "normal" society.

    It also feels uncomfortably like going into Star Trek territory. For example even Vulcans who are expected to live expressly by logic, are allowed to mate passionately. But we're supposed to think of Jedi as just going about their "business" in a rational, loveless way?

    Anyway, this is real odd rabbit hole to go down, and I'm not sure I care to. Lucas is at fault for being so damn vague. But he's not the type to really push sex to the forefront. (Kersh has the famous line "A kiss is equivalent to sex in the Star Wars universe") So I doubt "random hook-ups" were at the forefront in his mind. Star Wars is basically an old serial, in which typically the hero and leading lady would kiss an average of twice over 12/15 chapters. It's very "old fashioned" in it's style of romance and I prefer to think of it that way.
     
  23. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Anakin and Padme were "old fashioned" in their style of romance and look how that turned out.

    And--again--sex without a committed attached relationship is NOT the same as "random hookups." And if there are some in the audience who insist that the world is divided into only two categories, "people who have monogamous sex and only within committed relationships" and "people who have one-night stands without bothering to get the person's name"--that is the fault of those audience members, not Lucas or the Jedi.
     
    Lulu_Mars likes this.
  24. Valairy Scot

    Valairy Scot Manager Emeritus star 6 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Is your point that a majority of fans expect sex only within marriage and with romantic passion? Not prefer, but expect?

    Honestly, the Star Wars movies pretty much de-emphasize sex, anyway - it's going on like folks going to the bathroom - off screen. So it could be wild orgies with random strangers or a long term friends with sex or in-between.

    However, when you factor in these are folks with a strong connection to something greater than themselves, I would expect intimate encounters to involve some necessary degree of connectivity, rather than random and hot "get it on" pah-tays.

    Ultimately, though, who cares? We don't see it, so folks can pretend the Jedi are celibate to their hearts content. Other fans can believe different.
     
    Lulu_Mars likes this.
  25. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    You're right, and I lean towards the "long term friends with sex" option myself.

    The problem comes in when people start blaming the Jedi's problems on the mean Council that won't let them have sex, which is a non-argument. Or claiming that the Jedi are immoral because they forbid committed relationships but not sex.