Who was the best U.S. President from 1852-1896, and why? Franklin Pierce James Buchanan Abraham Lincoln Andrew Johnson Ulysses Simpson Grant Rutherford Birchard Hayes James Abram Garfield Chester Alan Arthur Benjamin Harrison Stephen Grover Cleveland (22nd and 24th)
Most of these Presidents were dreadful. Johnson, Grant, Buchanan, and Pierce, especially. Not Warren J. Harding terrible, but pretty terrible. Grant probably worst, then Buchanan, then Pierce, then Johnson. Of the decent ones, Lincoln far and away the best. Grover Cleveland probably second best, and then the heap of fat bearded men in the middle, Arthur/Hayes/Harrison/Garfield.
My rankings (giving a INC to Garfield because he was killed so early in his term) 1. Lincoln 2. Cleveland 3. Arthur 4. Hayes/Harrison/Grant 5. Pierce 6. Johnson/Buchanan Spaces are intentional
I kind of wish I did a poll just on the Presidents from Andrew Johnson to Grover Cleveland. That sure would have been interesting
Harding was essentially a mob boss. Buchanan was terrible and totally unprepared for the challenges he faced, but not deliberately bad. Grant was horribly corrupt, as well - if anyone is close to Harding, it's him.
Alexander III fan, are ya? (I didn't leave out that many since I was only focusing on the Empire era, but I included all the murdered ones because I found it amusing.)
I was thinking of Elizabeth mainly, especially since Peter III managed to flop his way onto the list.
Johnson is arguably at least as terrible as Harding. The guy turned back most of the promise of emancipation of black folks and the promise Lincoln gave in his final inaugural. He gave blanket pardons to unreconstructed confederates who then returned to their political positions in the South and threw many of the freed black folks out of political office and off of lands the U.S. had leased to them during and immediately after the Civil War. He paved the way for Jim Crow to ascend as the governing racial policy in the south for decades. He was a bad, bad president. Grant is more akin to Harding in that both were beset by corruption. Now if we are staying with the "what they set out to accomplish" then it has to be Lincoln. Cleveland might be second.
No one gives enough credit to Arthur. Not one of the best presidents, but a solid one, certainly. Still, Lincoln is the only choice here, obviously. Johnson is up there with Harding and Jackson for terrible presidents. Bottom five at the very minimum.