I don't think that "Prostitution", the term as used in this case, comes under The "Sexually Oriented" disclaimer. The post/signature itself wasn't about anything sexual, just using a valid term (i.e. not sexual slang, swearing) as a reasonable analogy. The TOS can be used to justify any form of censoring/moderating, but in this case, maybe that is a little excessive? But since it wasn't asked to be removed for that reason, it makes this is a moot point! UKS EDIT: See Barns and Twin_Kees Posts. Quicker with the Post button than I...!