Senate Going Postal: The 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

"Howard Schultz says what I'm thinking-- nothing!"

 

But he says it so well...?

 

This is why it's important that any sincere progressive should mercilessly mock and criticize him, even attack his his shallow character. He is a saboteur, a Manchurian candidate deployed directly from the aristocratic oligarchy to guarantee a second term for Trump, and all the right wing appointments to the courts, NLRB, FCC, and every other alphabet agency.

For the sake of unity the Democrats should keep the debates over their candidates as civil as possible but that doesn't apply to Schultz. He is a 21st century robber baron, with all the moral integrity of a thug sticking up a Seven Eleven but none of the courage.

 

Centrist women on twitter literally BT*O

 

^To be fair, it seems that they are making the difference between favorable and unfavorable, ignoring the "not known" answers. If this is the case, well known candidates like Bernie have an intrinsic advantage that influences the reliability of the result.

 

I wonder how long it will be before the Trump crowd ads "Jewish" to "Democratic Socialist."

The more syllables it has, the more it will rile up the MAGA base. 'Jewish Democratic Socialist' has the perfect Trumpian ring to it.

But of course the Orange Cheetoh'll get a mulligan because Jared/Ivanka-who-converted. Yup.

 

Not going to happen at all - an overtly antisemitic message is a lose-lose scenario for Trump.

 

that assumes that the things trump says are all calculated, with the consequences thought through, and that he is i presume some kind of master thespian only pretending to be the world's biggest imbecile.

 

I'm thinking lots of talk about how Bernie is a (((globalist))) rather than anything specific.

 

Campaign funded by George Soros masquerading as small donors!

 

If Bernie wasn't Jew we would be hearing the anti-semitism accusation against him 24/7, bipartisan effort.

 

Globalist is modern far right code for Jew.

 

Is Tulsi’s negative % black voters actively voting for anyone but Tulsi?

 

Oh, and the others add up to over 100%.

I just don’t know what net favourability means, I suppose.

 

Difference favorable and unfavorable

EDIT:

More in the detail, they ask : " do you like the candidate?"
Yes
No
Don't know

Then they subtract the % of No from the one of Yes.

This is done separately for each candidate. So do not expect to sum the percentages and obtain 100.

 

Um, yeah, I'm aware.

 

So as I suspected, the favourability index is the same thing that rhymes with the bullbittery index.

 

^ I don't know, this is beyond my knowledge of English.

 

So. You’re a Trump voter.

 

It depressed me that you spend so much time on a forum where you engage with actual socialists, communists, anarchists, social democrats, and you still have this Fox News-esc concept of what socialism actually is. Do you go to some clinic to get reindoctrinated?

 

My top picks are:
1. Sanders
2. Gabbard
3. Buttigieg
4. Warren.

If it comes down to these four, I'll be happy with whoever wins. Though at that point, I feel like it'll be less about policies and more about who has the best chance of defeating Trump. Finally, while I don't think Buttigieg has much of a chance, I like that he has a military background to counter Trump's, "The GOP will keep you safe," B.S. Who knows, he might surprise people in the debates.

 

Life reindoctrinates.

All you have to see is that socialists lost NYC 25,000 jobs and over $27,000,000,000 in tax revenue. You can spout all the economic theories you want. But real life will just punch you in the back of the head. Real life doesn't care about theories.

I wonder how many of those 25,000 people would rather have welfare than a job? We will find out in November 2020.