Saga Unpopular Star Wars opinions!

Yeah the design and feel of Rogue One was pretty good and consistent with the originals. The prequels look too advanced and cartoony.

 

Doing a good job regurgitating a tired and inaccurate meme there, buddy.

 

Why don't you spend your time in a thread called "Unpopular Star Wars opinions" and try and change peoples minds! Have fun!!

 

You're the guy waltzing into the Unpopular Star Wars Opinions thread and blurting out one of the most ubiquitous opinions about that trilogy in the mainstream consciousness as if it actually carries any profound meaning anymore.

 

*Edit. Don't care enough to reply

 

I mean I've got to agree that @Avnar 's opinion is unpopular.

 

I like the PT. I like the OT. I like the ST. It's when I try and watch them as a series that they fall apart Watched as three sets of movies I think they are all great.

 

SOLO is the best SW film since Disney took over.

 

The Resistance Bomber Pilot's helmets in TLJ are better than any of the previous Rebel/Resistance designs! They are great. They remind me of WW2 pilots

 

Not unpopular bro, I agree.

 

I have two that are veeeery unpopular.
I don't like the Millennium Falcon. At all. I know it's beloved by everyone but I just find it "weird".
I also don't like the Main Title music. I believe that the Star Wars music have the best movie scores ever, but I find the main title music too much "bombastic", for some reason. I actually think it works very well in the context of opening the movies and accompanying the title scroll, but I don't like to listen to it outside of the movies, while I listen to pretty much any other music tracks from the movies very often.

 

She's weird, but she's got it where it counts.

 

I'm getting sick of pirates in Star Wars. They're everywhere, overhyped, overplayed, and over done.

 

As does Ms. Gardner

 

I can relate. I like the Falcon in the OT, but I don't think it should've been featured so heavily in the ST. And I don't think it should've appeared at all in an initial Solo film.

 

Couldnt agree more.
This was the reason I ignored the Clone Wars series for many years.
Qui Gon Jinn is one of my favorite characters and I always felt his death and Obi Wans hard win against Maul in TPM was meanigless, because of the revival.

 

Yeah, I really liked how Obi-Wan was the first Jedi in a thousand years to kill a Sith. It really gave Obi-Wan something even more badass to his name when we see him in ANH.

I guess that title now goes to Anakin for killing Dooku? Maybe there is something poetic about Anakin killing the first Sith and the last (tho with Episode 9 probably not anymore), but I prefer if Maul died in I.

 

But Obi-Wan did win. Just like when he fought Vader on Mustafar, he beat them and left them both for dead. That they happen to survive despite their injuries doesn't deny Obi-Wan's victory over them. It would take away from his victories if, say, he did nothing once he was made aware of their survival. But he did do something, on both occasions. Of course, we will never know how Maul was originally meant to be defeated, but that's a different issue.

One thing it does take away is closure within the movies. But that's easily achieved by ignoring TCW altogether. At the end of the day, the series is an appendix to the six movies.

 

That's easy - it's because there weren't any.

 

That's not what I meant. The fact that Vader survived the chopping and burning (probably thanks to his immersion in the dark side) until he got medical help from Sidious is as unnatural as Maul surviving his bissection (and Maul was at least as immersed in the dark side as Vader). Of course, we know how Vader long term survival worked. That's not my argument.

Maul was indeed dead (and meant to be dead) as far as the movies were concerned. The fact that Maul was brought back in TCW was an opportunity that Lucas took when he was presented with a chance to tell more stories. Still, his fate was meant to be closed in TCW as well (Lucas made it a point to start ending story threads and characters that don't appear in ROTS ever since season 5), so his survival would have been taken care of within the show and leave the movies virtually unnafected. Sadly, that's not what happened since the show never got its intended ending. And with Disney, they've decided leave such a major character, specially an ex-Sith Lord, survive past ROTS.