main
side
curve

Amph Waiting For Superman: Gunnverse DCU/Elseworlds (New Trailer!)

Discussion in 'Community' started by Lazy Storm Trooper, Jul 2, 2013.

  1. Pro Scoundrel

    Pro Scoundrel New Films Expert At Modding Casual star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Not liking it is perfectly fine. Nothing wrong with not liking it. I don't like the two most recent Thors. But...
    Now you're just being insulting. Unnecessary. Keep it friendly, or I'll sick the eagles on you.
     
  2. Sarge

    Sarge 7x Wacky Wednesday winner star 10 VIP - Game Winner

    Registered:
    Oct 4, 1998
    Say what you will about the Snyderverse, at least it has an ethos, dude.
     
  3. Pro Scoundrel

    Pro Scoundrel New Films Expert At Modding Casual star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Yep. And that's why I was able to enjoy it, despite disagreeing with some of it's takes.
     
  4. godisawesome

    godisawesome Skywalker Saga Undersheriff star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2010
    (Insert Captain America saying “I get that reference.”)

    For the movies, she was the closest; Erica Durrance’s version of the character for the TV show Smallville was closer still, and honestly better for it. She was also ultimately a bigger reason to watch he show than anything else by the end - the show was best when either Rosenbaum’s Lex or Durrance’s Lois was Welling’s most imprint at screen partner.

    I also sometimes feel like after MoS, Adams’s Lois lost much of her “bite” because Snyder wasn’t Goyer, since Goyer wrote her in a bit more of an active role and as a deuteragonist for MOS, while Snyder seemed to make her a more conventional take on the pop culture idea of Lois.

    Okay, hear me out on how I’d do Lois for a new movie:

    - She’s the eldest daughter of a single father military intelligence officer who is, at most, ambivalent about Superman ; no “General Thunderbolt Ross - I mean, Lane” situation here, because frankly that’s lazy, and a MI dude reflecting a more professional wariness of superheroes is more interesting.

    - She was a military brat growing up, and still has the attitude of it, and even for a while attended National Intelligence University because she has her old man’s instincts… but left/was discharged after she got nosy about a scandal on campus and inconveniently exposed some students/faculty for misbehavior.

    - This gives her a chip on her shoulder, a complex relationship to her dad, and a more complementary skill set to Clark as journalists - he’s a skilled writer and former blogger now writing a column for the online Daily Planet but not an experienced investigator, and she’s a hard-bitten and relentless investigator and meticulous note keeper but with a rough, dry writing style and yes, numerous spelling errors (played less for humor and maybe as an actual sign of dyslexia she powers through.)

    - She’s also maybe a bit too aggressive at times, and feels like she belongs in (the TV version of) NCIS rather than at a newspaper - she always carries a knife, no matter how much she gets searched, has a small but prolific list of enemies, and has on more than one occasion been reprimanded by Perry White for “becoming part of the story” instead of just covering it.

    - She *does* have an mild open crush/mild admitted lust for Superman, but controls it in a very professional way, and has no interest in interviewing him when she can interrogate him about why he’s not taking care of some serious issue she and her “team” have been covering, while she and Clark have a much more genuine and front-and-center friendship/rivalry/partnership/gradually-increasing-sexual-tension. Jimmy Olsen is their best friend, and an amateur photographer, but also “man on the street” who hears about the crazy crap in Metropolis before they do.

    - I’d have the Clark/Superman personas be a little more convincing visually and different enough around Lois that it makes sense she doesn’t think Superman has a secret identity and doesn’t suspect Clark… u until there’s some kind of proof that Superman has a secret ID, right at an awkward time where she and Clark are about to get serious, and ironically right when he's about to tell her his secret, and doubly ironically right when she’s got a reason to realize what is going on and feel insulted about being deceived, adding a new level of belligerence and cat and mouse for a while before they eventually have it out and make up.
     
  5. Pro Scoundrel

    Pro Scoundrel New Films Expert At Modding Casual star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Nov 20, 2012
    For me, the core of the Lois/Superman relationship has always been that she cares about the truth, and is used to being disappointed by those she investigates. And with Superman, she isn't. His genuine goodness is exotic to her, and finally something that she finds inspiring, instead of dirty.

    And he is attracted to her BECAUSE she cares so much about the truth, and how fearless she is in pursuit of it. I think she inspires him.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2022
  6. godisawesome

    godisawesome Skywalker Saga Undersheriff star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2010
    My mild counter is that she also needs to be “actually” attracted to Clark because she knows him, and thus his goodness is no longer exotic and externally inspiring, but something precious and “real” in comparison… and it *is,* even if Clark’s usage of a secret identity might obfuscate that point.

    That’s my one major issue with the “triangle for two” idea - I despise the idea of Clark being a total charlatan identity and Lois being shallowly attracted to the “cape.”

    Make it a nuanced thing where, yeah, Lois is falling for the same guy in two personas, but it’s a deeper connection that she’s falling for with the more relaxed, modest persona she knows more intimately.
     
  7. Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid

    Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid Force Ghost star 6

    Registered:
    Mar 13, 2014
    CLARK KENT ISN’T A SOCIALLY INEPT NERD.
     
  8. Jabba-wocky

    Jabba-wocky Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    May 4, 2003
    I mean, was he? We see in these films that Asgardians can and do die. We also see from Thor 1 that he is able to take huge amounts of damage even after his humbling. So how much substantive difference actually exists?

    The incredible thing is the series only gets worse from here, and some how they kept making more movies. It’s probably the best precedent for the Elon Musk/Twitter thing in terms of rewarding colossal failure.
     
  9. Ramza

    Ramza Administrator Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Jul 13, 2008
    Goddamn right he isn't. Look at that swagger.
    [​IMG]
     
  10. DarkGingerJedi

    DarkGingerJedi Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Right. He's a mild mannered nerd. Except when the right tune plays.
     
    Sarge likes this.
  11. Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid

    Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid Force Ghost star 6

    Registered:
    Mar 13, 2014
    Penetrate through the dance floor.
     
  12. Pro Scoundrel

    Pro Scoundrel New Films Expert At Modding Casual star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Right, I wasn't meaning to differentiate between Clark/Superman. I agree that she should fall in love with Clark as Clark, and that Clark should be an equal. The Post-Crisis character evolution should not be rolled back for any character.
     
    godisawesome likes this.
  13. Ramza

    Ramza Administrator Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Jul 13, 2008
    While I'm a post-Crisis man I do love how, during the Bronze Age, there was a bit of a subtle Clark Kent renaissance, as a bunch of writers began to realize that a handsome and renowned investigative reporter probably wasn't going to be as unpopular as Clark was usually written to be. In a way the reboot was the final step in a process.

    Edit: In my more conspiratorial moments I think the story of how Earth-2 Superman and Lois got married became something of a prototype. "With Superman gone Lois is of course way, way into the suspiciously more assertive Clark Kent." Yeah, wild, like can you even imagine? :p
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2022
  14. darth-sinister

    darth-sinister Manager Emeritus star 10 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Registered:
    Jun 28, 2001
    With his powers, it's difficult to kill Thor. Without his hammer, he was toast.

    That's why it was abandoned by Snyder. There's no way to keep the triangle without making either character look bad. At least on the CW, Clark and Lois have an attraction outright, with Lois liking both.
     
  15. DarkGingerJedi

    DarkGingerJedi Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Nov 21, 2012
    I like a little bit of social awkwardness. He is an alien after all. Even if he grew up here. And..mostly because he's trying to be almost invisible or not really noticed. I like how Superman is bright and colorful, red, blue and yellow...while Clark is typically in a gray and white suit.

    And I love Reeve's take for what it is, it's iconic and perfect for that movie. but not as the definition of what Clark should be.
     
    Rew and Sarge like this.
  16. Jedi Merkurian

    Jedi Merkurian New Films Rumor Naysayer star 7 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    May 25, 2000
    "Look...The city is flying, okay? The city is flying, we're fighting an army of robots, and I have a bow and arrow. None of this makes any sense!"
     
  17. Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid

    Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid Force Ghost star 6

    Registered:
    Mar 13, 2014
    I thought George Reeves had a good take on Clark Kent for the 1950s. Much better than Christopher Reeve’s completely goofy awkward nerd.

    George Reeves maybe winks too much to the audience, but he’s calm and collected. The chief and his coworkers respect him.
     
    godisawesome likes this.
  18. godisawesome

    godisawesome Skywalker Saga Undersheriff star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2010
    I like the idea of him being a geek - swinging between exuberant confidence in areas he feels confident or just too enthusiastic to be cowed in, and then self-aware and consternated awkwardness when he’s out of his element, with in-between areas of interested and learning or bored and polite.

    One of the things that I did love about MOS, but wasn’t a plot-point or even a key thing about Clark’s characterization (sadly :p) was that their Clark watched KU football and wore a Royals shirt.

    I’d go further and use it to illustrate his geekiness: he’d be a huge fan of KU basketball, and even remained such when getting a journalism degree at the rival University of Missouri (…like an actual Jayhawk fan my brother knew when he was getting his journalism degree), increasing his confidence in that enough that when asked on Steve Lombard’s sports podcast, he goes from awkwardly trying not to embarrass himself in the football section to acting as a Jayhawk hype man when it enters the basketball section.

    Or alternatively, Lois drags him to a fine dining situation, where she knows how to blend in, and he’s treated as her adorkable farmboy hunk arm-candy clearly out of his element, until they confront the target of Lois’s investigation, at which point he becomes the good cop to her bad cop in a very practiced manner.
     
    Rew, Sarge and Pro Scoundrel like this.
  19. Pro Scoundrel

    Pro Scoundrel New Films Expert At Modding Casual star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Nov 20, 2012
    I liked the idea that it's more about his earnest idealism, and being from a small town, that initially gives him the "boy scout" label. It's why Lois calls him "Smallville". It's a mocking nickname that becomes affectionate as she gets to know and respect him.

    Less "awkward nerd" and more "sincere boy scout" surrounded by big city cynics.

    Yeah, a great performance from Reeve. His Clark was excellent at the time, but agree it shouldn't be the definitive take. The Post-Crisis take is just better.
     
  20. godisawesome

    godisawesome Skywalker Saga Undersheriff star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2010
    That’s part of the reason I’d like to see them maybe try making him more of a column writer or editor-at-large type of journalist who has to learn some of the ropes of investigative journalism from Lois.

    Mark Waid’s underrated JLA run (because he was following Morrison’s) had this fun little detail where Plastic Man genuinely geeks out at finding out that Clark Kent is Superman, even calling him “C.K.!” And proudly stating he reads his column. Editorials and opinion pieces feel like the kind of thing that could more easily show Clark’s idealism, and maybe even compliment his work as Superman.

    There’s always that “Superman can’t solve all the world’s problems” thing that could also be reinforced here; he knows he can’t physically manhandle poverty and wealth inequality, so instead he tries to galvanize people to do so through his writing.
     
  21. SHAD0W-JEDI

    SHAD0W-JEDI Force Ghost star 4

    Registered:
    May 20, 2002
    Once again donning my Capt Obvious garb - characters who have been around as long as Bruce Wayne/Batman and Clark Kent/Superman have been written in many different ways, some of them inconsistent with each other. That being said, I think the idea of Clark Kent being an awkward nerd is a more recent thing, and in some ways a "bleeding over" of the early Bruce Wayne/Batman dynamic. However, the two "secret identities" usually served very different purposes.

    Whether this would work or not, Bruce Wayne was supposed to come off as a lightweight, shallow, superficial, "party guy" who couldn't POSSIBLY be the grim, violent, physically uber-capable Batman, almost an exact crib of Zorro's dynamic (no kidding, right? A lot of the basic elements of Batman were...er...suspiciously similar to Zorro's, and DC later added in a story where the movie Bruce and his parents saw the night his parents were gunned down as a Zorro movie). That is, the "point" of Bruce Wayne is to throw suspicion off Bruce of ever POSSIBLY being Batman. Granted, some versions have leaned harder into this than others.

    With Clark Kent, I don't think there was ever any concern about needing a "cover". After all, glasses are, as we all know, a foolproof disguise. I think the idea was to give "Superman" a normal life, to weave in interactions with normal people, and to give him a job that could plausibly send him into all sorts of potentially interesting and even dangerous situations. I don't recall the "bumbling" Clark Kent being an element of the TV version, or many of the comic book versions, although the 70s Superman movies DEFINITELY embraced this (and yeah, while it might be normal for Lois to be a bit star struck by a handsome, exotic, powerful hero like Superman, her complete dismissal of Clark in the 70s movies never did 100% work for me!).
     
  22. Pro Scoundrel

    Pro Scoundrel New Films Expert At Modding Casual star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Nov 20, 2012
    Exactly. All of this. (And I love Mark Waid's run)
     
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  23. DarkGingerJedi

    DarkGingerJedi Chosen One star 7

    Registered:
    Nov 21, 2012
    The stumbling dork from the Reeves movies comes from him having to hide his powers as a kid and teen. He couldn't play football. He couldn't show off. He cleaned up after the jocks. And so that makes it look like he's a social dork, from the cool kids table perspective. They never assume he can kick the ball to the next state.

    Superman/Adult Clark plays into this side of himself when he's Clark. It's a part of him, but not really him. It's him living in society. And so it's the same role. He can't show off. He can't be the center of attention. He can't be a football player. He can't be the charming playboy like Bruce Wayne. So he's a mild mannered, gray suit wearing reporter who keeps quit and follows the truth, who seems sorta clumsy and folksy. He's from the country. In the big city. He's an aw shucks, that's swell kind of guy. And so no one assumes he can fly across the city and lift helicopters with one hand.
     
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  24. Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid

    Jedi_Sith_Smuggler_Droid Force Ghost star 6

    Registered:
    Mar 13, 2014
    I don’t like Reeve’s Clark Kent. It’s the bumbling that is too much. And there is no room for chemistry with Lois.

    I also liked work George Reeve the way Clark could use his super abilities to learn things no regular human could then nudge Lois or Jimmy into figuring it out for themselves.

    I like this idea of Clark Kent as an editorial writer. That can give him an opportunity to fight what Superman can’t. That’s a great concept.

    It would also be interesting if Clark at least starts as an Arts and Entertainment reported. Something funny about Superman being forced to go to plays and concerts. But I could see how Superman would have no time for that. Having it as a job forces him to pause and watch things and meet a deadline.

    I also like the idea of Clark being teamed with Lois to learn how to be an investigative reporter. She can show him the ropes.

    It just dawned on me - Peter Parker as a photographer is a lot like Jimmy Olsen.
     
  25. TiniTinyTony

    TiniTinyTony 2x Two Truths&Lie winner star 7 VIP - Game Winner

    Registered:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Reeve's Clark Kent is a master class in acting. When he's about to reveal himself as Superman to Lois and transforms back to Clark right in front of our eyes. Perfection.
    Tarantino's critique on Superman via Bill in Kill Bill Vol 2 is spot on.

    Do all portrayals of Superman need to be paired with a bumbling Clark Kent? No, but it's classic and I enjoy it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2022