When someone says "thats cannon" what the hell does that mean? thanks!! Thanks for everyone's input. If you want to learn more, please read our Lit. Forum "FAQ."
What is cannon? This is cannon; [image=http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:zG_1ZELgEXQC:www.nps.gov/fomc/archeology/cannon.jpg] This is quad-laser cannon; [image=http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:9cfF0qIMtOkC:www.starwars.jp/technology/image/quad_laser_cannon.jpg] They are cannons.
What is Cañon? This is cañon; [image=http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:ZwOJ7HflKCcC:fp1.tctwest.net/www.lovellchamber.com/images/canyon.jpg] What is canon? This is canon; [image=http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:Lj2Lt-KsjnEC:www.internetcamerasdirect.co.uk/images/a-canon-ixus-v2a.gif]
Canon (one N) refers to a list of works considered an authorized, "true" component of a larger work. In the case of SW, people argue that only the films are absolute, despite LFL policies saying otherwise. I think another example of canon is used in religion- like what ancient scrolls and stories are considered part of the bible or something.
How is answering the question seriously any less productive than answering the question jokingly TWICE?
But he didn't say I shouldn't support a redundant thread. Woohoo, I'm supporting a redundant thread! Woooo!
I wasn't supporting the redundant thread topic, by simply not answering the actual question with redundant real answers, and only making a joke. Answering the question with the real answers redundantly supports the redundant thread. Syntax already linked to "official" thread, which makes anwsering the real question, all the more redundant if one answers with the real answers in this thread which can already be found in the other thread that has already been linked to. The jokes and the related pictures, I put up, can't be found in that other thread, as far as I know, so they are not redundant with that other thread. Give it time the mods will lock this topic anyways since it is redundant, as link to the other thread with the same topic shows.
Lets ask R. Lee Ermey, shall we? [image=http://bigsblog.blogspot.com/images/ermey.jpg] "Listen up, dirtbag! Canon is something officially recognized by an organization or group. Technically EU is canon, since it is authorized and played upon by Lucasfilm Ltd. For example, an existing EU character is slated to be appearing in Episode 3. NOW DROP AND GIVE ME TWENTY YOU SLIMY EXCUSE FOR A BOOTLICKER!"
To post a straight answer here: Canon refers to an authoritative list of books that the Lucas Licensing editors consider an authentic part of the official Star Wars history. Our goal is to present a continuous and unified history of the Star Wars galaxy, insofar as that history does not conflict with, or undermine the meaning of Mr. Lucas's Star Wars saga of films and screenplays. Things that Lucas Licensing does not consider official parts of the continuous Star Wars history show an Infinities logo or are contained in Star Wars Tales. Everything else is considered canon. -Official Statement (Source: Star Wars Official Website) And: "Gospel, or canon as we refer to it, includes the screenplays, the films, the radio dramas, and the novelisations. These works spin out of George Lucas' original stories, the rest are written by other writers. However, between us, we've read everything, and much of it is taken into account in the overall continuity. The entire catalogue of published works comprises a vast history -- with many off-shoots, variations, and tangents -- like any other well-developed mythology." -The LucasFilm Licensing Continuity Editors There we go
"May 30, 2003 Question: The preface to David West Reynolds's article says that Lucasfilm gave its "formal imprimatur" of canon to the ICS books he wrote, and did so for at least one of them back in '99.... It seems to go against everything Sansweet and Cerasi said in 2001, and the official site's placement of the books in the EU section." Answers: Perhaps your confusion is with the meaning of Lucasfilm. "Lucasfilm canon" refers to anything produced by any of the Lucas companies, whether it be movies, books, games, or internet. "Movie canon" is only that which you see and hear in the Star Wars films. -Star Wars Editor, Leland Chee, starwars.com VIP thread The ICS books are canon. They don't carry the "Infinities" icon, so are considered part of canon. Chris ranked canon, i.e., the films and novelizations come first... meaning that if something in an EU novel or comic book or whatever contradicts something in the film, the film is more "true." Books in the EU are considered part of the canon of the universe. -Star Wars Editor, Sue Rostoni, starwars.com VIP thread What happened to the mods? Why haven't they locked this redundant topic yet?
So two people answered his question? Big deal. Why don't you just quit reading this thread instead of whining about those who actually answer? PS: I don't want an answer which is long and well researched -- nor will I care if you answer like you usually do.
>> What happened to the mods? Why haven't they locked this redundant topic yet? << Apparenmtly they don't feel it's so redundant afterall- but at least they otook time to correct the spelling of the thread I think one of the nice things about these boards, as opposed to the TOS boards, for example, is that with "redundant" questions, they're at least typically answered in that thread before they're directed to the "main" thread that already deals with that topic. It seems more courteous. Instead of saying " no i won't answer- go here", it's "here's your answer, but please look here for further details". It probably would have been over and done with if he had just gotten the answer, and the thread would have died. Jokes invite more jokes, however