Who would win in a fight: James Bond or Batman?

When you think about it, they're not all that different.

Both have:
-Gadgets (in fact, those gadgets are usually what makes them win fights)
-Kickass vehicles
-Luck
-Somewhat ridiculous villains (ie: Bane and Jaws)

Now, I know there's a bunch of big differences.

Such as:
-Amount of booty each one gets
-Help (Batman has Robin, Bond has the occasional helpful Bond girl)

Okay, rules are, no help, no vehicles, no guns.

So, who do you think will win? The Dark Knight (Keaton), or 007(Brosnan)?

 

James Bond

especially with the last few batman movies ::shudder::

 

Batman totaly ownes.


/,,/
Rock on!

 

Bond is ALL about gadgets, Batman can kick ass on his own, so

BATMAN

 

Batman.

 

Bond's fight with 006 in GoldenEye proves he could kick Batman's butt. Batman's costume is too bulky and would get in the way. 007 would use it to his advantage.

Even George Lazenby's Bond could beat Batman in a fist fight. Watch On Her Majesty's Secret Service and you'll see.

 

Bond. he's British.

 

James Bond!

:Targeter:

 

I'm guessing Batman... But I have the feeling it could be a tie.

 

Batman, he actually knows how the gadgets he uses work. Also, the people who write Batman don't care what he eats, unlike a certain British spy novelist who shall remain nameless.

 

Batman.

 

Batman

 

Just prior to their fight Bond would have been supplied with the exact gadget that he needs to beat Batman, and would use it at just the right time. He'd then pull out a British flag and wave it with one hand, while drinking a cup of tea with the other. God save the Queen.

 

Batman beat Superman, James Bond has no chance.

 

first off, Batman has learned all 127 major styles of combat, making him unconventional and unpredictable. His suit and weapons work together; a smoke grenade wont hinder Batman's vision, as his cowl has several different types of vision (ie night vision, infrared, etc.). The costume is made specifically for combat purposes, and it has a built in last-resort taser mechanism, which can shoot 200,000 volts over the entire suit.

Bond has his gadgets, and a gun. Plus combat training from the Brit's version of the CIA.

Batman has taken on CIA agents, and defeated them easily.
If this was just a chance encounter, with no weaponry or gadgets, Batman would still take Bond apart. If it was a planned encounter, Batman would still win. It would be a hell of alot more difficult, but Bond's gadget's are no match for the Bat's as he knows about all of the latest technology, and will have already come up with a way to counter them.

Batman

 

^^ Exactly! The Dark Knight would win without doubt.

 

if you couldn't tell, i'm a Batman freak

 

Batman easily

 

Atticus Kodiak.

 

Sean Connery Bond > Batman > Other Bonds

 

James Bond probably has good enough aim to shoot Batman squarely in the eye.

<[-]> Saber

 

Considering that it is completely impossible for Bond to lose in a fight, no matter who his opponent is (eight-foot tall giant with mouth of metal, killer terrorist with no sense of pain, a pair of kung-fu fighting strippers...) but Batman, on the other hand. He's been dropped by street thugs and supervillians alike. Bond's karma is just too good, despite all of Batman's gadgets.

 

I cant even believe this is a question.

Batmen would crush Bond. It wouldnt even be a fight. You all know what he did to superman right?

 

first off, Batman has learned all 127 major styles of combat, making him unconventional and unpredictable. His suit and weapons work together; a smoke grenade wont hinder Batman's vision, as his cowl has several different types of vision (ie night vision, infrared, etc.). The costume is made specifically for combat purposes, and it has a built in last-resort taser mechanism, which can shoot 200,000 volts over the entire suit.

Bond has his gadgets, and a gun. Plus combat training from the Brit's version of the CIA.

Batman has taken on CIA agents, and defeated them easily.
If this was just a chance encounter, with no weaponry or gadgets, Batman would still take Bond apart. If it was a planned encounter, Batman would still win. It would be a hell of alot more difficult, but Bond's gadget's are no match for the Bat's as he knows about all of the latest technology, and will have already come up with a way to counter them.

Wow, that's believable....

I'll say Bond since Batman sucks.

 

Batman would redefine ownage. He would create new and wonderful ways to inflict crippling pain on another human being. Not only would Bond lose, but he would lose so badly that every one of his two hundred and seventy eight illegitimate children would feel the incredible agony of their father's defeat. Q's pathetic little gadgets would snap like celery stalks in the unrelenting fists of the Dark Knight. 007's pithy little one-liners would come sputtering through bloody, swollen lips, unheard save by the back alley rats come to gnaw and nibble at the soon-to-be carrion that was once the pride of Her Majesty's Secret Service.

Unless we're talking Adam West Batman. In that case, everything I just said, but reversed.