main
side
curve
  1. In Memory of LAJ_FETT: Please share your remembrances and condolences HERE

ST Kylo Ren/Adam Driver Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'Sequel Trilogy' started by Pro Scoundrel , Jan 3, 2020.

Tags:
  1. Darkstrider

    Darkstrider Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 16, 2020
    really? when/where did JJ said that?
     
  2. ewoksimon

    ewoksimon Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Oct 26, 2009
     
    Darkstrider likes this.
  3. Darkstrider

    Darkstrider Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 16, 2020
    I don't think it was ever ego driven with Kylo. He literally hides behind it.
     
  4. ewoksimon

    ewoksimon Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Well yes, I'll say self esteem instead.
     
    Darkstrider likes this.
  5. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    I liked the helmet as a means to hide/reframe his identity. Which fits with Han telling him to take it off. But Snoke calling him a child in a mask only works to demonstrate that Kylo is acting like a child, which did not invoke the sentiment from me that the writers were apparently going for.
     
  6. Darkstrider

    Darkstrider Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 16, 2020
    Self esteem in what way?

    I think he hides he is not as evil as he needs to be to be succesfull/unquestioned in an organization such as FO.
     
  7. LedReader

    LedReader Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Oct 24, 2019
    I honestly just assumed that it had taken him that long to get all the little pieces gathered up and put back together.
     
  8. ewoksimon

    ewoksimon Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Oct 26, 2009
    Right, he wears it as a way of enforcing his persona of Kylo Ren, thus raising his own self esteem and masking his self doubt.
     
    Bor Mullet and Darkstrider like this.
  9. godisawesome

    godisawesome Skywalker Saga Undersheriff star 6 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 14, 2010
    There’s two aspects for the helmet, and I honestly think they only really got used well in TFA, and that TLJ’s rejection of it wound up being premature, wasteful and meaningless, while TROS’s use of it wound up being inconsistent, incompetent, and meaningless.

    From a marketing and iconography manner, the helmet was a serious asset as part of the original costume design, and t really worked in that manner. The cowl and tabard look is a pretty good similar-but-different look from Vader, easily marketed, and simply a more intimidating look for the character. Destroying it in TLJ while using a lamer and more ubiquitous black tunic and draped cape basically deadened everything about Kylo’s look. Driver is a good actor with a unique look, but his beautiful hair isn’t an asset for a villain the way a hooded helmet is. TROS brought the helmet back, but barely used it for anything, and the new costume just stitched in the cape to the tunic from TLJ, which really highlights how it was designed to be accentuated with a cowl and hood, not left alone on his head.

    There’s a reason a kids still more likely to have a TFA action figure or costume; it’s simply the better look.

    From a storytelling and characterization perspective, they just kind of lost track of whatever it meant or what it could mean. The helmet could either be the image he presents while simultaneously revealing something of what’s actually inside Kylo, or an encapsulation for the Kylo identity separate from Ben.

    I think TFA was using it more as the former, and overall pretty well; while Kylo’s humanity is revealed when he takes it off after Rey calls him a “creature in a mask“, that’s not necessarily a good thing - maskless Kylo is the type of human who violates a woman’s mind, murders his father and thanks him for being murdered, and petulantly rants and projects his own faults on an ascended henchmen before maiming him. Maskless Kylo is human, but very much earns the monster moniker, and that’s a scary thing. The mask really resembles more a refined projection of the beats within.

    TLJ is kind of because it seems to want to treat maskless Kylo as more human and therefore more sympathize, but doesn’t alter his character - changing the monsters look doesn’t change the monster, and the loss of the mask doesn’t accompany a change in character for Kylo: he doesn’t become more Ben, nor does he become more like Vader. TROS, meanwhile, wants to separate Kylo and Ben... but doesn’t use the masks for that, even though doing so is an easy thing to do - if Kylo wore the mask every time he was fighting or manipulating Rey, having the mask come off could much more easily illustrate when Ben emerges if it got shattered again.

    The helmet could have meant something significant in either of the last two films... and instead, destroying it and rebuilding it is more of an empty gimmick in both.
     
  10. Darkstrider

    Darkstrider Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 16, 2020
    an uncommitted villain feeling guilty for his uncommittment to the evil cause using a mask to commit to it more fully?
    Perhaps...or perhaps he wears it to hide what he already knows, and what he has always known (feared) that he will never be pure evil that's necessary to be to have the legitimacy to rule FO, a role he is stuck in after killing Snoke.
    He didn't kill Snoke for power, he did it for liberating himself from chronic enslavement/danger, and Rey from the acute one.

    I agree with you on helmet/cowl look being superior to helmet/cape. The helmet works better in half hidden combo, because to me it gives a sort of background for that void in the eye parts of the mask they were going with in TFA.

    The kintsugi lines give perfect meaning to it in TRoS, as to the state of his soul. It serves also as great foreshadowing of his redemption. And as that it should never be destroyed again because it transformed from means of hiding who he isn't to showcasing what he is. Repaired/restored.

    Can you imagine how awesome would he look if he wore it in combo with the cowl...wow. The switch to cape was to make him look more like Vader to appease to Vader fanbase, I think. At least that's how I understood it.


    Kylo is not a monster. He just likes to present himself as one. For many reasons.
    First, because it is what everyone expects from him. When it comes to insignificant people (FO, Galaxy, the world) it is a means to separate himself from them, keeping them on a distance, guarding his privacy.

    For those close to him, who should know better what he really is, he wears that mask/fascade/Kylo Ren persona to hide how hurt he really is about that grave misunderstanding. That hurt generates a sort of defiance in a sense oh you think I'm a monster, well let me show you just how big of a monster am I. He doesn't necessarily has to have helmet on to enable it. (That happened when Rey called him a monster first time, on Takodana)
    Childish, perhaps, but tell me who hasn't done the same at least once in their (adult) lives.

    And then there is a remorse triggered part of him that thinks he doesn't deserve to be anything else than a Monster, so he complies with it. And that is shown here:
    [​IMG]

    Kylo's humanity does come out when he is maskless. But I completely disagree (once again) with your representation of it. If he truly was that sinister then he would have never been redeemed and reinstated as Ben Solo. Because Monsters don't get redemptions. Kylo is not a poorly written villain. Or a failed villain. He simply isn't one no matter how hard he tries to be. Some may declare his reasons for wanting to be one (a villain, a monster) as childish or the result of bad writing or time limited/shallow on screen presentation, but I think that people get out of characters primarily that which they bring in themselves. Their original idea/ prejudice. The writing and execution of the artist are there for guidance of how one will understand the character. And the guidance here is: Kylo Ren is not a monster as he is sometimes presented, one should look deeper, past that. Because Monsters do not get redemptions.

    I don't think Kylo manipulates Rey at any point in their correlations because them being a dyad eliminate any possibility of manipulation: they feel and see each other as they truly are. They are one in the Force. He does that from the start of their bond (the interrogation) while Rey does it later in the story, after they touch hands in TLJ when she realizes that he should judge him based on what she feels and knows about him through that bond and not based on what she should feel about him. Or better yet what she's expected to feel about him.
     
    lovethedarkside likes this.
  11. Chémus

    Chémus Jedi Knight

    Registered:
    Dec 5, 2019
    That's a delusion right there. They make sure to solidify his status as a monster in his introductory scene. Ordering the deaths of a village of innocents without compulsion or hesitation makes one a monster, full stop. When he acknowledges himself as a monster to Rey, the movies give us no reason to believe he's lying. He obviously feels uncomfortable in the position he's carving out for himself against all sense and positive outside guidance, yet a monster he clearly is.
     
  12. Darkstrider

    Darkstrider Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 16, 2020
    Monsters have no light. His mother insists she has throughout all of ST. Luke insists he is not really gone. Rey insists his choice hasn't been made. Them three, through the Force have an insight into who Kylo Ren trully is. Not how he is meant to look like.
     
    lovethedarkside likes this.
  13. Kato Sai

    Kato Sai Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Apr 27, 2014
    And that is what disappoints me. The Jedi Prodigal arch is getting over used: Vader/Anakin, Revan, and now Ben.
     
  14. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Agreed. People/characters are defined by how they behave, not how they supposedly “feel” or what their relatives (or some girl who decided that his “feelings” were more important than her own self-respect or well being) say about them.

    Kylo demonstrated himself on screen to be unequivocally a monster, by his behavior.
     
  15. Darkstrider

    Darkstrider Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 16, 2020
    Sure, every character's every action is defining in fantasy world, not just their current/last one, gotcha ;)


    Am I looking in the wrong places but there seems to be no official Kylo Ren infused with red metal lines Helmet of premium quality to buy?! :confused:That, if true, seems to me like a huge marketing miss. I'd buy a black series one in a second to mirror the TFA one I have.
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2020
  16. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    He was not a monster at the end of TROS when he chose to no longer be one. He is not defined by his actions at the end of TROS prior to taking them, nor am I viewing his character in TFA and TLJ and most of TROS as the person he was at the end—because he had not yet chosen to be that person.
     
  17. reyvision

    reyvision Jedi Grand Master star 4

    Registered:
    Dec 12, 2017
    Kylo Ren is absolutely a monster. As was Darth Vader. The fact they came back to the light side does not mean they weren't monsters while they were on the dark side. They were. If they weren't, there'd be no need for redemption.
     
  18. Jedi Master Frizzy

    Jedi Master Frizzy Force Ghost star 7

    Registered:
    Jan 15, 2018
    Every monster can be redeemed even someone like Palpatine, but they must deep down want to be redeemed. Anakin and Ben Solo wanted and got redeemed. Maul wanted to be redeemed but he cond't let go of the darkness and he only found peace in Kenobi's arms.
     
    Iron_lord likes this.
  19. vaderito

    vaderito Jedi Grand Master star 4

    Registered:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Palaptine did nothing wrong, so redemption for what exactly? he was a legally elected Chancellor. He brought peace to the galaxy when he created the Empire in place of already broken Republic. he wouldn't be able to start a separatist movement if there wasn't already dissatisfaction with the republic itself. he just gave them tools to act out on it. he was nice to and full of understanding for Anakin unlike mistrustful Jedi Council. So that's good. OK, he tried to kill his granddaughter's boyfriend which is understandable, and also boyfriends uncle (when uncle was young) which is understandable too. otherwise, he did nothing wrong.
     
  20. starfish

    starfish Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Oct 9, 2003
    lol “palpatine did nothing wrong”
     
    wobbits, unicorn, Def Trooper and 5 others like this.
  21. Jedi Master Frizzy

    Jedi Master Frizzy Force Ghost star 7

    Registered:
    Jan 15, 2018
    Well except for killing and erasing an entire religion. and his cruel reing with his facism regime.
     
  22. christophero30

    christophero30 Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    May 18, 2017
    Palpatine was just a misunderstood puppy dog.
     
  23. vaderito

    vaderito Jedi Grand Master star 4

    Registered:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Jedi erased themselves when they swapped feeling the Force for Ikea sofa politics.
     
  24. Jedi Master Frizzy

    Jedi Master Frizzy Force Ghost star 7

    Registered:
    Jan 15, 2018
    If the puppy dog likes to turture you and laugh while doing it and makes you watch as he does to all you know and tells you hoe he'll do it. oh and likes oprea.
    Welll that's not true as then they be wiped out ages ago as it seems by TPM they were already deep into politics.
     
  25. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    “Palpatine did nothing wrong” if being a mass-murdering fascist isn’t wrong. Mass-murdering fascists all over the world use “bringing peace” as an excuse for their totalitarianism. Still immoral, both in our world and the GFFA.