While there are elements of Anakin's story that don't quite work for me, overall, I give GL huge props for trying to show us how someone who starts out with good intentions can fall. And I am definitely in the camp that believes that no, Anakin was most decidedly not "mentally ill". I don't want to get us sidetracked here, but I DO find it interesting that so many folks think the Jedi's teachings on attachment are without justification, when Anakin so beautifully illustrates the toxic possibilities of too much attachment. I would argue that Anakin isn't willing to slaughter kids, betray his friends and teachers and mentors (and murder many of them), and sell a galaxy into slavery in order to save Padme's life. He is willing to slaughter kids, betray his friends and teachers and mentors (and murder many of them), and sell a galaxy into slavery to spare HIMSELF the pain he would feel if he lost Padme. That is what he is terrified of. He almost perfectly illustrates how fear and attachment can lead to the Dark Side. On these Forums, there is a lot of discussion of "who is responsible" for Anakin. And to be clear, I am not suggesting that we aren't all, in various ways and proportions, strongly influenced and configured by many factors, both genetic and environmental, into the people we are at any given moment. However, I think we have to resist the mechanistic outlook that REDUCES us to these things, that acts as if each of us is just running a computer program, deprived of any agency. Just as Anakin himself knew he was wrong to massacre the entire Tusken village, I believe on some level he also knew it was wrong to murder the younglings, to turn on the Jedi, to strangle Padme, and to turn the galaxy over to Palpatine. He may have found the choice agonizing, at least originally, but he does make a choice - IMHO.
No. This sounds like an argument to justify or easily explain Anakin's turn to evil. Or this idea that there was something about Anakin that made him easily prone to evil. I don't buy it. I believe anyone is capable of succumbing to evil, given the right circumstances. You would be surprised at the number of "sane" people capable of harming children . . . especially if they viewed those kids or kid as less than human. I can recall a line spoken by one of the main protagonists in the cable series "The Alienist" - "I believe we all possess the raw material required to commit horrible acts. We just need the right or wrong combination of events to make the raw material combustible." For Anakin, it was first his mother's kidnapping and murder. As for Padme, it was his fear of losing her . . . after losing Shmi. What happened to Anakin - becoming a monster - could have easily happened to any of the other major characters if the right set of circumstances had presented itself.
I wouldn't describe Anakin as any of the above. Well, he could be an archtype, but he has always struck me as too complicated for that.
Anyone can be a monster. Everyone possesses traits that can allow them to embrace evil. Everyone. There is nothing special about Anakin in that regard. Do people want to believe there is something unique about Anakin that easily makes him a monster in order to ignore the possibility that everyone has the potential for evil? Or is this some need to paint Anakin as evil or unstable deep down in order to avoid viewing him as someone who is complex?
I’m confused why it’s controversial that Anakin probably qualifies for having a personality disorder?
is Anakin mentally ill no he is just very afraid, very depressed and very angry. it depends to what degree it effects you. i wouldn't call him mentally ill... tho i think he had a breakdown which 1 in 4 people have in their lives. Some people might even say that in some cultures believing in the force, having visions would be out of normal mental parameters but no i don't think he is mentally ill per se and not really a helpful phrase.. at least not in a sci fi fairytale
In a court of law, whether someone is truly insane, has a mental disorder, or even a personality disorder, is being used as defense for their actions, then it's generally recognized as an insanity plea. It doesn't literally mean that someone with a mental or personality disorder is actually insane.
The "legal definition" required for an insanity plea to be successful, is pretty restrictive in most jurisdictions though.
Why is that even relevant? Someone with a personality disorder is not any more likely to be insane than someone without, and whether they are legally insane is going to be assessed upon its merits. Most personality disorders have nothing to do with legal insanity and are going to be useless as a diagnosis in a court. Indeed perpetrators of violent crimes likely have antisocial personality disorder.
Or their violent crimes originate from greed, lust, revenge, hate, fear, etc. One doesn't need to possess an "antisocial personality disorder" or any other kind of mental ailment to commit a violent crime. You just need the right motivation, combined with the right moment or series of moments to commit violence.
Okay? You seem reluctant to admit that Anakin may qualify for a personality disorder because you somehow think that a person having disorder undermines the message?
No, we're reluctant because at no point does Anakin show any signs of a personality disorder. He's an entitled, petulant ***hole. That is not a personality disorder, nor a case of being mentally ill. His violent actions all stem from his greed and fear. Not from some deep rooted mental disorder, nor from any personality disorder. This is an issue in our society. Every time someone commits an atrocity, everyone is quick to jump to the person is mentally ill. It's usually, "They have to be sick in the head to do something like this." People don't want to admit that there are individuals out there who are simply sadistic pieces of ***t. The reality is in very few instances, is the individual actually considered to have some sort of disorder that would lead to their actions. Claiming any sort of mental or personality disorder, is just an excuse to make Anakin's actions seem less heinous. A way to justify the unjustifiable. This is no different than the arguments being made over in the "Defending Anakin and the Tuskens" thread. We can examine the motivations. Delve into the how and why, but there is no justification for Anakin's actions. There is no excuse.
Firstly, if I recall correctly, a psychologist actually used Anakin as an example for borderline personality disorder for teaching purposes. https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/10679-psychology-darth-vader-revealed.html Secondly, I’m not sure why you view a diagnosis for a personality disorder as an excuse, and I’m going to assume that you’re not suggesting I’m excusing such behaviour. It’s simply a reality if someone, for example, is a sadist, they probably have a mental health disorder. That’s just the truth of the situation.
Love how in Clone Wars multimedia project Anakin is still the Anakin that everyone hates he is a jerk and arrogant like in the movies unlike TCW i always believed Hayden Anakin is what Young Vader should be he is going to become a villain after all and makes his relationship with Palpatine more credible
I would lean towards yes. I'll play armchair psychologist and say that he comes off as bipolar (in both the Prequels and Clone Wars). He feels strongly one way or another, and hardly anything in between. Also, I think you have to have some instability to become something like Darth Vader, and spend over half your life in such a suit no less.
Was Anakin intended to be presented as mentally ill? No, I don't think so. However, given how frequently he saw combat during the Clone Wars, I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if he developed some combat related trauma throughout the years. Plus I can't imagine having frequent visions of loved ones dying would be good for anybody's mental health either.
Why do I get the feeling that many people cling to this "mentally ill" theory to do the following: 1) To give Anakin an excuse for why he became evil; or 2) To wallow in this pretense that only certain people embrace evil due to some mental condition? This feels false to me. I've said this before and I'll say it again. Anyone can become monster. Anyone. The ability to become a monster IS NOT limited to those with a "certain mental condition". And I believe Anakin represents this. I suspect that very few people are willing to acknowledge that even the average human being is capable of behaving monstrously when the right emotional buttons are pushed in the right situation. Including a great number of psychologists.
That’s pretty presumptuous. Not only is it not an excuse for his behaviour if he happens to fit the criteria for a mental health disorder, but him having a mental health disorder is not mutually exclusive from the fact that anyone is capable of evil.