main
side
curve

Vermont to consider lowering drinking age

Discussion in 'Archive: Your Jedi Council Community' started by Crash_Davis, Feb 29, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    *Adds nothing to the discussion*

    I began drinking at 17!
    I stole my dad's whisky.


     
  2. GrandAdmiralJello

    GrandAdmiralJello Comms Admin ❉ Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque star 10 Staff Member Administrator

    Registered:
    Nov 28, 2000
    ophie: Utter rubbish. I did not and do not care to debate what is the proper drinking age, and I had made that clear from the start. If you wish to consider it a debate over your choice of argument, then fine, but otherwise you're imposing conditions that were never there to begin with.

    It is not considered good debate form to ascribe a position to an interlocutor that doesn't exist and then claim victory when he is not inclined to be pigeonholed---I'm not sure where you learned your standards of argumentation.

    Re your question: drinking alcohol is a right of full citizenship to the same extent that marriage, leaving high school without a parent's permission, and the ability to sign binding contracts are.


    If they were, then they would be legislated in the same package. But since they are not, it's eminently clear that these rights exist separately of one another.

    The ability to stand for office is also a right of citizenship, but there are different age limits imposed. Why? Because there are reasons for it.

    Being fit to be a senator is not the same as exercising judgment that one ought to leave school, or one can sign a contract.

    These are fundamentally different things, and I'm very surprised you'd think they were at all the same.

    After that, the same laws apply to them that apply to their parents--except when it comes to buying alcohol. How is it rational to assume that someone is competent to sign a marriage license, punch a voting ballot, or go to the electric chair at 18, but that he or she is not yet mature enough to deal with a can of beer?


    Because there are a different set of competencies presumed for each? You can argue that an 18 year-old is competent enough to drink, I don't care to dispute you. But you cannot argue that he is competent enough to drink because he can vote.

    That's manifestly ridiculous.
     
  3. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003
    I can. It is not "manifestly" ridiculous.
    Care to take it on?

    I'll ask you first to be sure and not to be described as "utter rubbish" :)



    Edit: Taunt. Read your last lines again.
    They are as contradictory as contradictory gets, with the added flavour of flawed understanding.
    [face_mischief]



     
  4. GrandAdmiralJello

    GrandAdmiralJello Comms Admin ❉ Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque star 10 Staff Member Administrator

    Registered:
    Nov 28, 2000
    You apply the same skills you use when voting in order to drink?

    Okay then. :)
     
  5. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    Oh my, your very first reply is useless.
    Revise it and get back to me.
    If I use this as a premise, or even try to say anything remotely sensible as a response, we're going nowhere.

    Be sure to learn logic by then.
    :)




    My advice: state the point you're trying to make, without trying to sound smart.
    Whatever the hell the skills are which people apply when drinking and/or voting should also clearly be stated.




     
  6. poor yorick

    poor yorick Ex-Mod star 6 VIP - Former Mod/RSA VIP - Game Host

    Registered:
    Jun 25, 2002
    The same cognitive skills go into deciding which way to flip the lever and whether to pick up that shot glass, yep. :)
     
  7. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    That's very wrong.
    I expected more of you.

    You should know that the cognitive skills go into deciding whether to pick up the shot glass or the pint of beer.

    Voting requires no such skill!

    Silly woman.


     
  8. Ender Sai

    Ender Sai Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Feb 18, 2001
    No, but could you not say the same underlying rationale which says that person A can be trusted to vote, enter into a contract, serve jail time for an offense, serve in the armed forces and purchase cigarettes (the latter I'm assuming?) would also be the same one that says a person can legally drink in a responsible social setting?

    i.e. that we have decided for whatever reason 18 = adulthood and therefore, as the song once said, Anything Goes!?

    ES
     
  9. GrandAdmiralJello

    GrandAdmiralJello Comms Admin ❉ Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque star 10 Staff Member Administrator

    Registered:
    Nov 28, 2000
    ophie: No. Drinking laws are also predicated on self control. Again, you can argue that an 18 year-old has self-control, but I really can't see how the same exact sort of judgment is employed.

    See, an incompetent vote can be harmful only if there are millions of other incompetent votes. But someone who is incompetent to drink can be a very viable threat to others. Is it demonstrable that the same percentage of 18 year-olds who can competently vote can also competently drink?

    I'd wager anecdotal evidence that the two things aren't linked, but maybe I'm full of it? :)

    E_S: I would say no. Being 18 does not grant full adulthood in US law. They can still be considered dependants up until the age of 21 under certain conditions--but once they hit the age of 21, then they are considered full adults. The ages between 18 and 21 are a sort of limited adulthood.

    So the adult responsibilities rationale really wouldn't kick in until 21.

    Again, you could argue that someone could be responsible enough at 18 on its own merits, but I wouldn't say that suggesting that someone can do "x, y, and z" at 18 is a good enough reason.
     
  10. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    You could say that, but then you wouldn't be winning any JC arguments.

    Silly Australian.
    Go drink some beer.

     
  11. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    I happen to know laws.
    Drinking laws are in no way related to self control.

    Drinking laws (at least here) are all aimed at stopping public trouble.
    That's all. If you get drunk out of your head and stay out of trouble, the law has nothing against you. Challenge me on this, please, if it is difficult to understand.

    Laws don't give a damn about the individual or whether he is "competent" to drink or not.




     
  12. GrandAdmiralJello

    GrandAdmiralJello Comms Admin ❉ Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque star 10 Staff Member Administrator

    Registered:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Drinking laws are in no way related to self control.

    Drinking laws (at least here) are all aimed at stopping public trouble.
    That's all. If you get drunk out of your head and stay out of trouble



    What precisely do you think self control is?

    Observe:
    See, an incompetent vote can be harmful only if there are millions of other incompetent votes. But someone who is incompetent to drink can be a very viable threat to others.


    Sounds like trouble, doesn't it?

    If you're reading things into my arguments that aren't there and aren't reading the things that are, I really can't help you.
     
  13. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    Self control has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
    You can drink, have full control of yourself and still be above the legal limit for, say, driving.

    Staying out of trouble, in context of what I said, would be: not driving.


    -Removed- Baiting makes the baby angels cry.

    Edit: If you want to play on words, please define your views of self control and I'll be glad to say whether or not they apply to laws.
     
  14. Ender Sai

    Ender Sai Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Feb 18, 2001
    Thank God I'm not an American; land of the free my ass. :p

    ES
     
  15. poor yorick

    poor yorick Ex-Mod star 6 VIP - Former Mod/RSA VIP - Game Host

    Registered:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Jello, we invaded Iraq and then said "oops." :p If you can't hurt someone with a vote, I don't know what you can hurt them with.

    The idea is that, at some point, we all become adults and can do adult things. In the U.S., that somewhat-arbitrary point has been placed at age 18. Hell, you can buy a gun at 18. That might be more dangerous than either having a vote or a beer. Or even both.

    It does not make sense to claim that either:

    A) drinking alcohol is somehow different and more complicated than other adult activities

    or

    B) that the human capacity for decision-making develops later with regard to whether to drink.
     
  16. GrandAdmiralJello

    GrandAdmiralJello Comms Admin ❉ Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque star 10 Staff Member Administrator

    Registered:
    Nov 28, 2000
    I'm not sure what you're describing and then giving the name logic, but it's not... logic.

    As I said earlier, you're happily interpreting my words your own way and then declaring they're wrong because of it. It's a nice strawman argument. But don't waste my time with it.




    [b]ophie/E_S[/b]: Another point is that drinking age laws refer to the selling of drinks, as regulated by law. A parallel would be how state law says that insurance companies must treat students as dependants until the age of 21, even if they are "adults" or not. These are laws that specifically restrict the actions of a private organization.

    However, the drinking of alcohol is NOT regulated by this law. It is perfectly legal for someone to buy a drink on behalf of someone who is underage.

    The problems in college campuses are entirely different from this, as students can get busted for consuming alcohol all the time--but this isn't something the law dictates. That's private University policy--nobody under 21 can drink while on campus. That's a private choice by the university--government funded or not--and it has nothing to do with the rights of citizenship.

    So if there's a problem with students drinking underage, then it has nothing to do at all to citizenship or adulthood since the law doesn't say they can't. This is no different than a restaurant saying that you can't smoke there--it's their own choice, independant of laws against smoking in [i]public[/i] places.

    What do the drinking age laws of the government have to do with this? Nothing.

    As for the Iraq thing, sorry, I must have missed the part where there was a public vote over whether to invade. I guess this should more apply to being a certain age when running for office, even if one is an "adult"? Thanks for the point in my favor!
     
  17. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003
     
  18. Lord_BlackAdder

    Lord_BlackAdder Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    Sep 14, 2003

    :(

    But challenging people who can fight back is what the JC is all about :(
    I want people to fight back! And I urge them to!


    I only do it when I know they can.

    Jello: I wasn't being "mean" to you and I think you know it.
    Ophelia: You're a girl. So there.

    I'll go away now :(



     
  19. morrison85

    morrison85 Jedi Grand Master star 5

    Registered:
    May 13, 2005
    They raised the selling age of Beer in Germany.. to 18 years.
     
  20. Ender Sai

    Ender Sai Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Feb 18, 2001

    Personally I'd say the problem lies with the asinine laws in the US on drinking, but that's just me. I find it odd that you have this concept of almost-adulthood, and that you'll allow people to do just about anything but buy a beer in a bar at 19. It's one of those things that makes me glad I'm not a Yank.

    ES
     
  21. LastExit

    LastExit Jedi Youngling

    Registered:
    Sep 5, 2007
    To foreigners, a Yankee is an American.
    To Americans, a Yankee is a Northerner.
    To Northerners, a Yankee is an Easterner.
    To Easterners, a Yankee is a New Englander.
    To New Englanders, a Yankee is a Vermonter.
    And in Vermont, a Yankee is somebody who eats pie for breakfast.


     
  22. Ender Sai

    Ender Sai Chosen One star 10

    Registered:
    Feb 18, 2001
    In Australia, I'm indifferent.

    ES
     
  23. Jedi_Keiran_Halcyon

    Jedi_Keiran_Halcyon Jedi Knight star 6

    Registered:
    Dec 17, 2000
    How about we solve things with licenses? To be able to drive a car, you have to show a basic understanding of car safety and traffic laws, as well as demonstrate your ability to drive.

    How about a alcohol license, where you can buy alcohol from say, the age of 16, but only if you pass a test demonstrating that you are aware of the short- and long-term effects of alcohol consumption, as well as the relevant laws?

    Come to think of it, a military license wouldn't be too bad an idea either. Give a test to make sure kids actually understand what signing up for the military means for their lives, as well as how the military works and what their legal rights are and will be.
     
  24. SithGirl132

    SithGirl132 Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Jedi_Keiran_Halcyon, I agree. An alcohol license, similar to a driver's license, might do some good. I hate that I am trusted with a car at 16 but not able to vote until 18- driving is certainly a good deal more dangerous, and I really don't like the arbitrary-ness of the laws on age.
    I feel one of the problems with underage drinking is the kids who have had too much alcohol and are in medical danger, but either they or their drinking companions are scared of what will happen if caught. Lowering the age to 18 could help with this by making sure that college students will get medical help if needed without the legal issues. And the paradox of 'you're old enough to die for your country, but not old enough to drink' is true. I don't really think that's right; the two ages should be the same, whether 18 or 21. It seems like the American age laws are arbitrary and don't make much sense.
     
  25. Emperor_Billy_Bob

    Emperor_Billy_Bob Jedi Grand Master star 7

    Registered:
    Aug 9, 2000
    Being a teetotaler, I don't particularly personally care either way, however...

    The legal age really doesn't mean all that much. Kids start drinking way before even 18 honestly.

    What probably needs to change is the drinking CULTURE we have in this country. Cigarettes are slowly becoming socially unacceptable, marijuana is doing the opposite, and hard drugs are and probably always will be mostly relegated to the nasty fringes of society.

    Alcohol is the most dangerous drug on the map at the moment. We need to de-acceptabalize it.

    Then again, I heard that the reason the legal drinking age was 21 was because alcohol has negative effects on brain development, which continues until about the age of 21.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.